Education Counts

Page navigation links

  • Education Counts Logo
  • Skip to Primary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to Secondary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to content

Site Search

Site Search

Site navigation menus

  • Know your Region
  • Communities of Learning
  • Find your nearest school
  • Early Learning Services
  • Directories
  • Publications
  • Indicators
  • Statistics
  • Topics
  • Data Services

Search the education counts website

Find pages with

Narrow results by:

Rongohia te Hau: Effective support for culturally responsive teaching

3. Co-constructing a continuum of effective teaching practice

This best evidence feature is about demonstrated Māori expertise in the ‘how’ of scaling improvement for Māori enjoying and achieving education success as Māori in ‘mainstream’ education.

“Because we’ve co-constructed it, because it’s based on what Māori children told us would work for them, that continuum helps keep the teachers and teaching safe.”

Professor Mere Berryman
Director, Poutama Pounamu Research and Development Centre

Expertise matters

Specialist professional development expertise is required to lead this process in the first instance. Professor Berryman and Expert Partner, Therese Ford, from Poutama Pounamu, demonstrate the process of working with both leaders and teachers to develop a continuum of effective practice.

The Mana Ōrite partnership process designed by Poutama Pounamu demonstrates expertise in each step of a respectful change process that is respectful of everyone’s mana.

Cross-curricular reach

Te Kotahitanga professional development was highlighted as exceptional in the Teacher professional learning and development best evidence synthesis because of the rarity of such high impact intervention with cross-curricular reach.

Rongohia te Hau is a key strategy in enabling culturally responsive improvement in teaching and learning across the curriculum.

The Rongohia te Hau findings are an invaluable resource, but for the findings to inform more effective and more culturally responsive pedagogy, teachers need expert support in the challenging change process that follows.

A shared focus on what works

Professor Berryman explains the process of developing teachers’ proficiency in carrying out structured observations of the teaching practice of their colleagues:

"So it really keeps us talking about the pedagogy and not the person, and it really keeps us focused on what works, but it also means that we have a shared language and a shared understanding of what we’re looking for."

While Rongohia te Hau initially draws on the use of survey tools, the improvement process that follows focuses on deepening teachers’ understandings of the evidence about effective teaching. Assessment conversations inform rather than displace the focus on teaching. Every step of the way is informed by learner voice.

Find out more

Berryman, M., Ford, T., Nevin, A., & SooHoo, S. (2015). Culturally responsive contexts: Establishing relationships for inclusion. International Journal of Special Education, 30(3), 39-51.

Education Review Office. (2016). School Evaluation Indicators: Effective practice for improvement and learner success. Wellington: Education Review Office.
See links to School Evaluation Indicators: Domain 4: Responsive curriculum, effective teaching and opportunity to learn. pp. 29 – 32.

The co-construction approach led by the Poutama Pounamu experts reflects the findings across best evidence syntheses and recent systematic reviews on effective professional development.

Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung. I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why: Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

  • Importantly, the engagement of school leaders in the co-construction and the development of a continuum of effective teaching practice for culturally responsive teaching, also provides leadership development opportunities crucial to improved student outcomes.
  • Of all leadership activities, leadership active participation and engagement in teacher professional learning and development was found to be the activity that made the most difference to valued student outcomes in the quantitative findings of the New Zealand School leadership and student outcomes best evidence synthesis.
  • Figure 4: School leadership and student outcomes.

Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Crisp, B., Araviaki, E., Coe, R., & Johns, P. (2020). Developing great leadership of continuing professional development and learning. UK: CUREE.

  • These researchers highlight the importance of professional development focussing on student wellbeing as well as achievement and call for more attention to teacher wellbeing in the change process.

Poekert, P., Swaffield, S., Demir, E., & Wright, S. (2020). Leadership for professional learning towards educational equity: a systematic literature review. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 541-56.

  • These reviewers concluded that ‘When teachers participate in leadership development that maintains a critical focus on social justice, they can acquire skills to empower and amplify student voice, rather than reinforcing the structural inequalities that have long marginalised students on the basis of ability, race, language or culture’ (Poekert et al, 2020, p. 552). They reported a high weight of evidence challenging the danger of using ‘culturally blind’ approaches to the use of data to inform policy and practice.
Rongohia te Hau: Effective support for culturally responsive teaching
Introduction/Whakataki
  1. Using learner, whānau, and teacher feedback
  2. Different perspectives inform action
  3. Co-constructing a continuum of effective teaching practice
  4. Collecting evidence of pedagogy
  5. The learning is in the conversation
  6. Impacting Māori success
  7. Racism: Taking those blinkers off
Topics Home

Navigation

  • BES Programme
  • Rongohia te Hau: Intro

Introduction videos

  • Our choice: ‘forced fit’ or ‘belonging’ as Māori
  • Ko tātou ngā rangatira o āpōpō
  • A way forward

Te Kāhui Ako o Te Puke videos

  • 1. Using learner, whānau, and teacher feedback
  • 2. Different perspectives inform action
  • 3. Co-constructing a continuum of effective teaching practice
  • 4. Collecting evidence of pedagogy
  • 5. The learning is in the conversation
  • 6. Impacting Māori success
  • Learning from Te Kotahitanga Phase 5 Principals
  • 7. Racism: Taking those blinkers off

Downloads

  • Table 9: Māori succeeding as Māori (PDF, 152.9 KB)
  • Professor Sir Mason Durie Letter (PDF, 141.7 KB)
  • Rongohia te Hau: A Platform for Change (PDF, 217.0 KB)
  • Ka Hikitia: Demonstration Report Phase 5 (PDF, 4.8 MB)
  • Ka Hikitia: Technical Report Phase 5 (PDF, 1.2 MB)

Contact Us

Best Evidence Synthesis |
Hei Kete Raukura

For more information visit BES on Education Counts, or email the: Best Evidence Mailbox.

Home Close Menu
  • Know your Region Show submenu
  • Communities of Learning Show submenu
  • Find your nearest school Show submenu
  • Early Learning Services Show submenu
  • Directories Show submenu
  • Publications Show submenu
    • Early Childhood EducationShow submenu
      • Responding to diverse cultures: Good practice in home-based early childhood servicesShow submenu
    • MāoriShow submenu
    • SchoolingShow submenu
    • PacificShow submenu
    • Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • Learning SupportShow submenu
      • Learning Support Coordinators Evaluation: Phase 2Show submenu
    • InternationalShow submenu
    • Publication SeriesShow submenu
  • Indicators Show submenu
  • Statistics Show submenu
    • Annual Monitoring Reading RecoveryShow submenu
    • Attainment of 18-year-oldsShow submenu
    • AttendanceShow submenu
    • Attendance under COVID-19Show submenu
    • Beyond StudyShow submenu
    • Early Learning ParticipationShow submenu
    • ECE FinancesShow submenu
    • ECE ServicesShow submenu
    • ECE StaffingShow submenu
    • Early Leaving ExemptionsShow submenu
    • Entering & leaving teachingShow submenu
    • Fees Free tertiary educationShow submenu
    • Financial Support for Tertiary StudentsShow submenu
    • Funding to SchoolsShow submenu
    • HomeschoolingShow submenu
    • Initial Teacher Education StatisticsShow submenu
    • International students in NZShow submenu
    • Language use in ECEShow submenu
    • Literacy & NumeracyShow submenu
    • Māori Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • NZ's Workplace-based LearnersShow submenu
    • Number of SchoolsShow submenu
    • Ongoing Resourcing SchemeShow submenu
    • Pacific Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • Per Student Funding for SchoolsShow submenu
    • Post-compulsory education & trainingShow submenu
    • School BoardsShow submenu
    • School Board RepresentationShow submenu
    • School Leaver DestinationsShow submenu
    • School Leaver's AttainmentShow submenu
    • School RollsShow submenu
    • School Subject EnrolmentShow submenu
    • Stand-downs, suspensions, exclusions & expulsionsShow submenu
    • Teacher NumbersShow submenu
      • 2020Show submenu
    • Teacher TurnoverShow submenu
    • Tertiary Financial PerformanceShow submenu
    • Tertiary ParticipationShow submenu
    • Tertiary Population DataShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResearchShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResourcingShow submenu
    • Tertiary Achievement & AttainmentShow submenu
    • Tertiary Summary TablesShow submenu
    • Total public expenditure on educationShow submenu
    • Transient StudentsShow submenu
    • Vocational Education & TrainingShow submenu
  • Topics Show submenu
  • Data Services Show submenu

Site information

  • Site map
  • Contact us
  • Feedback
  • About this site
  • Glossary
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright, Legal & Privacy
  • Links
  • © Education Counts 2022
  • Ministry of Education logo.
  • New Zealand Government logo.
Scroll to top of page