Pacific parent representation on the boards of trustees

What We Have Found

Pacific parent representatives on school boards has increased in the last ten years, but dropped considerably between 2018 and 2019. The number of Pacific parent representatives is very different among school decile and school type.

Date Updated: March 2020

Indicator Description

The proportion of schools with fair Pacific parent representation on the board of trustees as at 1 December.

Why This Is Important

Active participation by Pacific parents in planning, development and delivery of education services will help to ensure that those services are appropriate and effective for Pacific students. Pacific representation on boards of trustees is one key mechanism for participation.

Boards of trustees of state schools must hold elections for parent representatives every three years. A board may also decide to adopt a mid-term election cycle where half of its parent representatives are elected at a mid-term election (18 months after the triennial election) and the remainder are elected at the triennial election.

Triennial elections have been held every three years from 1998.  A by-election can occur at any stage in the election cycle if an elected parent representative leaves the board and creates vacancy.  Although the major changes in board membership occur in triennial election years, there is still some fluctuation in intervening years due to by-elections and mid-term elections.

How We Are Going

The proportion of schools with fair Pacific representatives declined by 3.3 percentage point between 2018 and 2019. Between 2010 and 2019, Pacific parent representatives on the board increased from 33% to 39% in 2019 with highest representation in 2014 (41%), 2017 (43%) and 2018 (43%). The number of Pacific parent representatives in the remaining schools does not reflect fair representation of Pacific students in these schools.

In 2019, there were 503 schools with sufficient number of Pacific students to expect at least one Pacific parent representative on the school board. This expectation on the school is based both on the number of Pacific students and the number of positions on the board.

Figure 1. The proportion of schools with fair Pacific representation declined between 2018 and 2019.


Figure 1. The proportion of schools with fair Pacific representation declined between 2018 and 2019.

Demographics, such as family size, may contribute to the under-representation of Pacific parents in the boards.  Based on the Population Census 2018, for every 10 school aged Pacific children (5-19 years old) there are 12 Pacific adults aged 25 to 49. In comparison there are 20 adults for every 10 children of the total population.

In 2019, around 33% of Pacific children lived in low income households with less than 60% median household income before housing costs (Child poverty statistics: Year ended June 2019). In comparison 23% of the total children lived in low income households.

Decile

In 2019, fair Pacific representatives was variable amongst deciles. Decile 1 schools had the highest proportion (47%) of fair Pacific representatives on the board over the national average (36%), while decile 6 schools had the lowest Pacific representation (22%). Decile 10 schools had no representation; however, there were only 4 schools that were expected to have Pacific representatives on the board.

Figure 2.  In 2019, fair Pacific representatives was variable amongst deciles.

Figure 2.  In 2019, fair Pacific representatives was variable amongst deciles.

School

In 2019, fair Pacific representatives on the school board was more common in special schools[1] (50%) and secondary schools (48%) than in primary schools (37%) and composite schools (33%). The proportion of schools with fair Pacific representation was higher in single sex schools with an average of 50% of 28 from schools; while in co-educational schools was 39% of 475 schools.

Figure 3. Special schools and primary schools had the highest Pacific representation.

Figure 3. Special schools and primary schools had the highest Pacific representation.

References

  • Savant, R. (2010). Analysis of the Board of Trustee Elections: 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Ministry of Education (2010).  Effective governance - working in partnership.  Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Statistics New Zealand. 2018 Census, Population and migration (Age and sex by ethnic group (grouped total responses), for census usually resident population counts, 2006, 2013 and 2018 Census (RC, TA, SA2, DHB)).
  • Statistic New Zealand (2019) Child poverty statistics: Year ended June 2019.

Footnote

  1. Special schools are those schools that support high needs students, either in day schools or residential schools across New Zealand.

Indicator Pages

Downloads

Where To Find Out More

Contact Us

Education Data Requests
If you have any questions about education data then please contact us at:
Email:      Requests EDK
Phone:    +64 4 463 8065