Education Counts

Page navigation links

  • Education Counts Logo
  • Skip to Primary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to Secondary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to content

Site Search

Site Search

Site navigation menus

  • Know your Region
  • Communities of Learning
  • Find your nearest school
  • Early Learning Services
  • Directories
  • Publications
  • Indicators
  • Statistics
  • Topics
  • Data Services

Search the education counts website

Find pages with

Narrow results by:

National Education Network Trial Extension Publications

Publication Details

This report summarises the findings from the evaluation of the National Education Network Trial Extension (NEN Trial). It focuses on changes to teachers’ practices and the learning experiences of their students as a result of their school’s participation in the NEN Trial from July 2011 through to July 2012. Findings reported include respondent perceptions of the impact of the NEN Trial, their confidence, attitudes and values regarding digital technologies, the professional development they have experienced and the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning.

Author(s): Lorrae Ward (PhD) with the support of Patrick Marentette and Kane Meissel, Cyperus Limited. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Date Published: June 2013

Executive Summary

This report is the latest in a series of reports focused on the NEN Trial and developed to inform the ongoing design and implementation of the Network for Learning. Data regarding the NEN Trial were collected over an 18-month period commencing in March 2011. The final surveys were implemented in July/August 2012.

The theoretical framework for this report centres on realizing the potential of digital technologies to transform the learning experiences of children; to move our schools into a 21st century, networked paradigm of operation. It is argued that the benefits of an initiative such as the Network for Learning will only be fully realised when a network of learners exists; when individuals, classes and schools are collaborating and interacting beyond the four walls of their classrooms. It is acknowledged that the extent of transformation will depend on the starting point; that what is innovative in one classroom may be business as usual in another. The high standard deviations reported in the 2011 and 2012 surveys support this.

The NEN Trial

The NEN Trial was initially implemented in 2008 with 21 Proof of Concept schools. It was then extended to 102 schools. The additional schools came from three regions: Christchurch, Nelson/Marlborough and Ashburton. The latter group of schools were the "greenfields" loop as both Christchurch and Nelson/Marlborough were already part of established regional loops. Also an established loop was the Wellington loop, whose schools were part of the Proof of Concept group.

The objectives of the NEN Trial were to better understand the policy, educational, technical and commercial issues related to the implementation of a national network for schools. Included in this was the potential transformational impact on teaching and learning practices. In this way the NEN Trial was an ideal test bed for the Network for Learning1. This report has been written with this purpose in mind - to inform the development of the Network for Learning.

Methodology

The data reported here were gathered through online surveys conducted in July 2011 and again in July 2012. Two sets of surveys were used: a Principal Survey and a Teacher Survey. All schools participating in the NEN Trial were sent links to both surveys and asked to participate. Regional support providers were also asked to encourage schools to participate.

In addition, two of the regional support providers were interviewed to discuss the key findings from the surveys and to gather their perspective on the success - or otherwise - of the NEN Trial. Their comments have been taken into account in the discussion section of this report.

Participants

There were 44 principal respondents and 209 teacher respondents in 2012. This was less than for the 2011 surveys. Many of the 2012 respondents were different people from those who completed the survey in 2011. This meant only a very small sample of each could be used to measure changes over time. The matched sample of teachers for 2011/2012 was 53 respondents; the matched sample of principals was 26 respondents.
The demographics of the 2012 samples and the 2011/2012 matched samples were broadly representative of the NEN Trial schools.

Survey design

The surveys used in 2012 were more comprehensive than those used in 2011. The three major scales, related to teaching and learning, remained the same enabling a measure of change over time. Also the same were items related to infrastructure, expected and reported impact and teacher confidence. There were a number of additional items in the 2012 survey related specifically to the impact of the NEN Trial, the professional development provided and the attitudes and values of respondents.

The response scales, in both surveys, were mostly six-point scales. In general terms they followed the same pattern e.g. 1 = not at all, 2 = very slightly, 3 = slightly, 4 = moderately, 5 = strongly, 6 =very strongly. The major exception was the response scale used to measure the use of digital technologies in teaching and learning which was specifically designed and ranged from awareness through to regular use.

Findings

Following are the key findings from the body of this report. They are reported thematically and largely according to the different sections of the report.

Attitudes towards digital technologies

The respondents to both surveys, on average, reported that digital technologies are important priorities, even when compared to other competing priorities for limited resources and funding. The data suggest that the value and importance of digital technologies is cumulative across a range of purposes. However, the high standard deviations across all items would suggest that there is a wide variation in attitude, something that was observed in schools visited during the NEN trial evaluation.

Respondents did report that teacher access was more important than student, in terms of both the Internet and devices. This suggests there is still a teacher-centric view in these schools. However, comments made by principals with regard to Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and wireless connectivity suggest that they are now moving to a greater focus on student access and use. The question of which is more important - teacher or student use - is perhaps a moot one. Ideally both would have access. However, increasingly the literature suggests that the potential of digital technologies will not be realised until the technology is in the hands of students2.  A positive from this study is that schools do seem to be focussing on student access now. The quality of that use is still to be considered.

Further, the use of digital technologies was seen as supporting a range of outcomes rather than being used solely for a particular purpose. Though overall levels of use for different outcomes were low, it is likely that the cumulative use of technologies - in some instances- is high. The data suggest that teachers tend to either use digital technologies or not; that the level of use is reasonably consistent across a range of outcomes.

ICT Infrastructure

The levels of reported satisfaction with school infrastructure are a concern with teachers reporting that they were only slightly to moderately satisfied with the infrastructure in their school. The means ranged from 3.03 to 4.24. This represented a slight trend towards an increase in satisfaction over the reported figures in 2011. The one area where a statistically significant increase was reported in satisfaction was with student access to the Internet. This may be due to the installation of wireless networks in a number of schools, and other improvements to school networks.

The NEN Trial provided access to ultrafast broadband to the gate and upgraded school networks where necessary. However, SNUP (School Network Upgrade Programme)3 does not necessarily provide for ubiquitous and normalized student access to the Internet. Nor does either initiative provide for student access to the devices they need. Schools still need to enable student access and this is costly.  These were the areas where teachers were least satisfied. The emphasis on wireless and BYOD in the principals' comments would suggest an awareness that student access is an issue, one which is heightened in a networked paradigm.

Student devices are paid for either by schools or by parents (BYOD schemes) or a combination of both. In some instances, schools are able to access external funding grants4 for technology but this is not likely to be common. Others are likely to rely on the fundraising of parent organisations within their communities. It is not the place of this report to discuss this issue in detail and a description of current school funding models is beyond our brief.  Suffice to say there is anecdotal evidence that the funding of technology is an issue for schools and may well remain an issue for some time, as schools grapple with the issues of equity and responsibility related to BYOD programmes. A recent publication by Lee and Levins (2012)5 highlights the many variations of BYOT  and the potential for home - school collaboration to improve student access.  They suggest that BYOT is a way of pooling home and school resources but also acknowledge that schools will have to ensure those from less affluent homes are supported. It also highlights the extent to which those schools that have normalised the digital have some form of BYOD in place.

The impact of the NEN Trial

The findings from the 2012 surveys suggest that the NEN Trial, at best, has had a moderate impact on the schools that participated.  The principals reported a slightly higher level of impact than the teachers. Over both surveys, the highest reported impact was for the professional learning opportunities provided for teachers (xˉ =4.34) as reported by the principals.

For both groups, the reported impact in 2012 did not reach the expected levels reported in 2011. In a number of areas the reported achieved levels were statistically, significantly lower than what had been expected. Further, there does not appear to be a strong correlation between what was expected in 2011 and what was reported in 2012. It would seem that the respondents expected things of the NEN Trial that were not implemented. Why this is so needs to be considered. There are a number of possible explanations: their expectations were too high; they did not realise what other capabilities were needed to achieve the desired impact; the implementation of the NEN Trial was not designed to meet, or was inadequate to meet, their expectations.

The lowest areas of reported impact (slight), in both surveys, were related to interaction and collaboration outside the school community. These were also the areas where there was the largest difference between expected impact (2011) and reported impact (2012).  This is concerning if one takes the view that a National Education Network should be enabling more interaction beyond the individual school. It would appear that the schools expected something more than did occur. The NEN Trial, through the Kiwi Advanced Research and Education Network (KAREN)6 provided the capability for greater communication between schools and other members, but this does not appear to have occurred.

In addition to enabling changes to teaching and learning the Network for Learning is expected to allow for greater efficiencies for schools and to lower operational costs. However, the data from the NEN Trial suggest that, at least initially, this may not be the case:

  • Nearly half of the teachers (49%) and 61% of the principals reported that teachers' professional workloads had increased as a result of the NEN Trial. The results were not as pronounced for administrative workloads where 37% of teachers and 24% of principals reported an increase. Very few teachers or principals reported a decrease in either administrative or professional workloads with most of those not reporting an increase reporting no change.
  • Similar results were reported for the financial impact of the NEN Trial. Only 5% of principals reported the financial cost of operating their school had decreased. The rest were evenly divided between an increase and no change. Just over half of the principals (55%) reported that the cost of providing professional development to their staff had increased. Only 8% reported it had decreased.

Professional development and learning

The professional development opportunities provided through the regional support were reported, by the principals, as having the most impact on the participant schools, although it was only moderate. Further, those respondents (n=24) who completed questions related to NEN Trial professional development reported being highly satisfied overall with what they had received.

The data from the 2012 Principal Survey suggests that a range of professional development was offered across the trial. The low number of schools reporting no professional development in each of the areas suggests this was true across the three regional loops. Interestingly, there was no consistent reporting of professional development by loop in terms of those participating. It is likely that school size and location have an impact on the number of teachers able to participate.

Of note, is that less than half of the principals reported that all their teachers attended professional development related to the use of digital technologies in the classroom or to foster collaboration beyond the classroom. This means that in a number of schools the diffusion of any innovation or learning is dependent on internal collaboration and interaction networks. Of the teacher respondents, 73% reported they had received professional development related to the integration of digital technologies in their classrooms. This compares with only 35% reporting professional development related to collaboration outside the classroom and 22% reporting professional development related to their students using web 2.0 technologies.  This is likely to be at least part of the explanation for the low levels of impact of the NEN Trial. The technical features of the NEN Trial are related to greater access to the world beyond the school. The professional development appears to be focused on use within the school.

One could argue a sequenced approach to professional learning - it begins in the classroom then moves to a more networked focus. The problem with this approach is that a networked approach is about a shift in paradigm and definitions of learning and school; not about skills in using technology. Showing teachers how to use technology within their classroom will not shift their paradigm or view of schooling. Most teachers are already successful users of technology in their professional practices - it is just not as apparent in student learning7.

Also of note, is that the majority of the professional development these teachers report receiving has been informal. Further any workshops have tended to be led by colleagues from their school. Just over half of the teachers (56%) reported they had attended a session led by an external facilitator while 91% reported they had attended a session led by a member of their staff. While this can be seen as a positive, one needs to be cautious about the extent to which internal professional development fosters the necessary challenge and critique needed to change practice. If the internal professional learning is disseminating new knowledge, sharing and building on the learnings of others, then it can be powerful. However, too often such internal communities can reinforce and support current practice rather than supporting the creation and sharing of knowledge8.

Expertise and Confidence

Related to the provision of professional development is the extent to which teacher expertise and confidence is raised. In 2012 the teachers did not report particularly high levels of confidence and expertise. The area they were most confident in was their ability to learn how to use new technologies and applications (xˉ  = 4.76). The areas they were least confident in were related to the use of digital technologies to extend the learning experiences of students and to collaborate with others (xˉ  = 3.76; xˉ  =3.85 respectively). They were always less sure of their ability to facilitate student use than to use something themselves.

Interestingly, given the reported impact of the professional development there were no marked increases in reported levels of confidence or expertise across the matched sample of teachers. The statements used in the survey were very specific; they related to using digital tools to support student learning. It may be that teachers are confident in their ability to use something (skills based professional development), know how tools can be integrated into teaching and learning (pedagogical professional development), but are not sure about how to actually do these things in their classrooms in ways that will promote learning.

Teachers were also asked about the confidence and expertise of their students. Anecdotally, a number of teachers have commented in the past that students are not as expert on computers as they expect them to be and that they need a lot of support to be able to use them. This is interesting and needs further consideration given the use of digital technologies by the young in their lives outside school.

The data reported here support the anecdotal evidence in that the teachers report that it is between slightly and moderately accurate that their students are able to effectively use digital technologies. The areas where they report the lowest mean levels are for collaboration with others. Given the extent to which young people use technology to communicate and interact outside school this seems surprising.

It may be that teachers are judging their students' abilities to use technology by their view of how they should be used. That is they are focussing on the process and method of use rather than the outcome of use.  Outside school, most students are intuitive users of technology: they make the tool do want they want it to: they learn to do something when they need to and know how to get the outcome they want9 This may not sit easily with the more structured approach to learning in a school, or to the need of many teachers to control not only what is done but how it is done.  Nor does it sit easily with notions of there being a "right" way of doing things.

Changes in the use of digital technologies in classrooms

The data presented in this report suggest the influence of the NEN Trial on participating schools has been minimal in terms of changes to teaching and learning. While there is a statistically significant increase in student use of technology across a range of outcomes, as reported in the student outcomes scale, the overall levels of use are low.   Some possible reasons for this are discussed in the report.

Comparison between the 2011 and 2012 results show that for the other scales utilised there was a trend towards increases in use across all items but that this was not statistically significant for any of them. Further, the increase was small in all instances at both an item and component level.

In the eLearning scale (Principal survey) the Collaboration component mean remained the lowest and was statistically, significantly lower than that for either Culture or Capability. Across all the individual items in this scale the largest mean increase was only 0.37, and was related to the involvement of teachers in professional development.

Similarly, in the Teacher survey the mean level of use of digital technologies to Create artefacts remained higher than their use to Collaborate. The comparison between 2011 and 2012 for the matched sample showed an increase in the mean level of Collaboration, which approached statistical significance. The increase for the Create component was very small. The largest mean increase for any single item was still only 0.62 and was for the creation of artefacts in a collaborative/interactive environment with other teachers. None of the item increases were statistically significant. The implication is that teachers are starting to use technology in ways that extend the classroom context but only slightly.

The use of technology by students for particular outcomes, as evidenced in the student outcome scale, increased between 2011 and 2012 and in most instances this was statistically significant.  This finding suggests that there has been an increase in student use of technology within the classrooms of the respondent teachers. This does seem to contradict earlier findings and it is worth considering this difference further in future research. Perhaps the nature of learning in classrooms is changing?

However, the levels of reported use in 2012 still did not reach the levels indicated by 2011 respondents as their preferred level of use.  In both 2011 and 2012 the preferred level of use was statistically, significantly lower than the reported current level of use. This suggests teachers would like to see their students use technology more often but do not seem to be able to implement it.

This is interesting in that teachers are the major determiners of what occurs in their classroom. They largely decide the "how" of learning. Presumably, if they wanted their students to do more with digital technologies they could ensure this occurred? One explanation is that student access to technology remains a key barrier. The other explanation is that while in theory teachers say they want to do more this is not the case in practice. That is their espoused and actual theories of practice are quite different. It may be that their preferred levels are in fact what they see as "ideal" practice and not necessarily something that is possible10. While it could be argued that more time and/or greater responsiveness are needed it could also be argued that the integration of digital technologies into schools has been a policy and professional development focus for many years. It may be time to reconsider the nature of that professional learning and to genuinely reflect on the efficacy of what has occurred in the past.

Discussion

The NEN Trial evaluation was over a one-year period and as such one could argue there has been insufficient time for real change to occur. However, it needs to be remembered that many of these schools are part of well-established regional loops; they have been involved in ICTPD in the past and were presumably ready to embrace the technical capability provided by the NEN Trial.

The findings summarised above suggest that despite the access to ultra fast broadband and professional support little has changed in the schools, particularly with regard to collaboration and interaction beyond the school gates. In all sections of the report whether reporting impact, professional support or confidence, the lowest means were reported for the use of web 2.0 technologies and collaboration beyond the school. At an implementation level the NEN Trial appears to have remained focussed on the classroom. It has not been implemented within a networked paradigm.

Further, teacher use and teacher needs were always emphasised over those of students. The implication is that our education system is still intrinsically teacher-centric. The focus has been on providing the tools to the teacher first - and only now are student needs coming to the fore. This is, perhaps, understandable but it does highlight another shift for schools to make along with that from paper-based to networked. Concurrently, they need to move from being teacher-centric to student-centric; from focussing on technology for teachers to ensuring students have the technology they need. They need to also think about the world beyond the school gate and what it can offer students.

Perhaps the key finding from this report is the need for those implementing and designing the Network for Learning to showcase the benefits of being networked, of utilising the Internet to extend the learning experiences of students beyond the classroom. The real potential of digital technologies to transform teaching and learning lies in their ability to enable us to reframe our notions of learning as something that occurs in a classroom, with a teacher, to a timetable. Currently they appear to be mainly used to supplement or enhance what is being done. In many instances, they do this well, but there is a question of value for money in terms of the investment in both infrastructure and professional development. Are there sufficient benefits to warrant the cost expended?

Creating a technical network is relatively easy; creating a network of learners, a learning environment that exists beyond the school is much more difficult. This requires a philosophical shift in the thinking of all those involved in education. It requires the shift to occur before the initiative is implemented - for people at all levels of education to be thinking in a networked paradigm, to be willing to look beyond the classroom, to take risks and to look for new solutions to old problems.  Then digital technologies become part of the solution; they have a purpose and are used in ways that realise the benefits they offer.

Student access to the Internet and devices is currently problematic for most schools. It would appear that for schools wanting to maximise the potential of digital technologies and the networked world wireless and BYOD will have to be a primary focus. The findings in this report would suggest that many have already realised this. But schools need support to make the right decisions and they need help in ensuring the potential benefits are realised. The solution to this may reside in the need for schools and the government to be more explicit about whose responsibility it is to provide which aspects of the technology. If the Network for Learning can save money on content, services and access then that will free up school budgets for the necessary devices.

More problematic, arguably, is that digital technologies are largely being integrated into a 20th century notion of teaching and learning. When a school is digital it is essentially using technologies within a paper-based paradigm. They support what is happening in the classroom, they make administrative tasks easier for teachers, they make the access to information easier for both teachers and students; they enable multiple ways to present information and to synthesise what has been learned. But these uses do not transform the way students learn or what they learn. That requires a conscious decision by schools and teachers to do things differently.

Transformation of teaching and learning will not occur through the provision of technical and pedagogical capability alone. It is necessary to transform mindsets - to provide a new philosophy and paradigm within which people think. Schools and their communities need to be shown what is possible, how to utilise what is beyond the school gate and how to ensure that translates into outcomes for students.

The questions this raises are:

  • How prepared are our schools and teachers to take risks? Will their communities and "the system" allow them to do so?
  • In this era of accountability how do schools merge the demands of National Standards and NCEA with innovation and transformation? Particularly if the "educational experts" do not themselves understand innovation in the digital world.
  • Is our education system really looking for transformation? Or does it want replacement and enhancement? Is the desired end-point the use of digital technologies in classrooms, within schools that are instantly recognisable?

If transformation of how our students learn is the desired outcome then schools need to be supported to shift their perspectives, to take risks and to share their learning: The potential benefits of doing so need to be made clear. Learning from the corporate and social worlds can help; looking beyond education for guidance. A national education network has the potential to be a powerful tool for enabling this shift.

Perhaps the words of one of the principals involved in the NEN Trial best sums up what is needed:

Three things irk me as they quickly become barriers to others engaging: How to avoid "technical train-spotting"; how to avoid people rushing off to the "next big thing"; how to avoid "brand name-blindness".  The combination of all three of these should be a diagnosable medical condition that renders you unreliable in the advising or development of others.

I am well aware that we are only part way into a Digital Revolution that is likely to change society, including lifestyle, work, and learning more so than any of the similar 'revolutions' from the past (e.g. Industrial Revolution). Knowing that we don't know how this will end nor how it will get there is also OK. We just need to factor continuous change and 'un-learning' into our thinking and approach.  I believe it is important that we equip our Teachers and Students, and those advising/training them with a wider view. So we can scaffold their learning experience to one of continuous change and development - and that's OK.

For example, "We know people learn and work better in groups. Especially when they feel confident and safe enough to share their ideas and questions. This 'software/tool/device' is one way we can currently support our learners to do this. There will be a newer version or an even better way soon enough. But in the meantime here's how we can do this, ...and how others have used it, ...and the effects that it has had..."

Most importantly we need to give our people the confidence to fail. To give something a go; have it crash on them; recover the moment and the learning; reflect on it a bit; and then at an appropriate time give it another go.

The full potential of the NEN Trial won't be realised until we learn that this is about equipping people with perspectives, as well as skills, and the confidence to fail. And through this nurture the flair to play in the future.

Footnotes

  1. Network for Learning website.
  2. Halverson, R. & Smith, A. (2008). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-54.
    SRI International. (2011). Innovative Teaching and Learning Research 2011 Findings and Implications. Innovative Teaching and Learning (ITL) Research website.
  3. For more information on this project go to School Network Upgrade Project on the Ministry of Education website.
  4. This tends to be low decile schools.
  5. Lee, M. & Levins, M. (2012) Bring your own technology. ACER Press, Melbourne.
  6. Lee and Levins use the term BYOT (Bring your own technology) rather than BYOD (Bring your own device) as it is more inclusive of a wide range of technologies.
  7. KAREN (Kiwi Advanced Research and Education Network) is a data network providing high capacity, ultra high speed connections between New Zealand's universities, polytechnics, Crown research institutes, schools, libraries, museums and archives, and out to the rest of the world.
  8. This is evidenced in a wide body of literature, such as the research on the Laptops for Teachers programme. It is also evidenced in the findings in this evaluation. For more information on learning communities in a New Zealand context refer to the Network Learning Communities evaluation reports available on the Te Kete Ipurangi (TKI) website.
  9. Evidence for this can be found viewing any young person on public transport or in a cafe. It can also be found in literature such as that found on the Common Sense Media website. An example is their report: Social Media, Social Life: How teens view their digital lives.published in 2012.
  10. For a discussion of this see: Ward, L., Parr, J.M. and Robinson, V.M.J. (2005). Constructions of practice: Adding ICT to the swamp. Paper presented at the Hawaiian International Conference for Education, Hawaii.

Navigation

  • Schooling
  • Digital Technology

Downloads

  • Full Report (PDF, 1.1 MB)
  • Full Report (DOC, 1.5 MB)

Contact Us

Ultra-fast Broadband in Schools
For more information about this report, please email the:  Ultra-fast Broadband Mailbox

Home Close Menu
  • Know your Region Show submenu
  • Communities of Learning Show submenu
  • Find your nearest school Show submenu
    • Find Your Nearest SchoolShow submenu
  • Early Learning Services Show submenu
  • Directories Show submenu
    • API Early Childhood & SchoolsShow submenu
      • School Directory APIShow submenu
    • Early Childhood ServicesShow submenu
    • Māori Medium SchoolsShow submenu
    • New Zealand SchoolsShow submenu
    • Tertiary ProvidersShow submenu
      • Careers NZShow submenu
    • School Mergers, Closures & NewShow submenu
      • Directories HomepageShow submenu
    • Kura Arareo MāoriShow submenu
    • Enrolling at your local schoolShow submenu
  • Publications Show submenu
    • Early Childhood EducationShow submenu
      • OECD's Education at a GlanceShow submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2020Show submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2019Show submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2010Show submenu
        • Indicators Live: Education at a Glance 2009: Results for New ZealandShow submenu
        • Measuring up: How does New Zealand’s tertiary education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2008Show submenu
      • Annual ECE Census 2020: Fact SheetsShow submenu
      • Early childhood education centre-based parent support & development: Final reportShow submenu
      • Effective learning in early childhood education?Show submenu
      • Evaluation of the sustainability of ECE services during the implementation of Pathways to the Future: Ngā Huarahi AratakiShow submenu
      • Impact of 20 Hours ECE on playcentres 2008Show submenu
      • He Whakaaro: How participation in early learning is affected by COVID-19Show submenu
      • He Whakaaro: What affects how often mothers read books to their pre-schoolers?Show submenu
      • Literature review: Transition from early childhood education to schoolShow submenu
      • Outcomes of early childhood education: Literature reviewShow submenu
      • Quality early childhood education for under 2-year-oldsShow submenu
    • MāoriShow submenu
      • Māori-medium EducationShow submenu
        • A literature review focused on Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs)Show submenu
        • Ngā Tamariki o Te KupengaShow submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • Te piko o te māhuri, tērā te tupu o te rākau: language & literacy in marae-based programmesShow submenu
        • Te Piko o te Māhuri: The key attributes of successful Kura Kaupapa MāoriShow submenu
        • Te Piko o te Māhuri: Ngā āhuatanga matua o te Kura Kaupapa Māori whai angituShow submenu
        • Toitū te Reo: Evaluation of Tāiki E!, Haumi E!, Toi te Kupu & Eke PanukuShow submenu
      • English medium EducationShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Te Kotahitanga: 2004-2008Show submenu
        • Hangaia te mātāpuna o te mōhia: learning foundations for Māori adultsShow submenu
        • Hei titiro anō i te whāinga: Māori achievement in bachelors degrees revisitedShow submenu
        • Mā te huruhuru ka rere te manu: how can language & literacy be optimised for Māori learner success?Show submenu
        • Summary of the Evaluation of Te Kotahitanga: 2004-2008Show submenu
      • Māori & English mediumShow submenu
        • Te pakeke hei ākonga: Māori adult learnersShow submenu
    • SchoolingShow submenu
      • LearnersShow submenu
      • Learning Support & WellbeingShow submenu
        • Learning Support Coordinators Evaluation: Phase 1Show submenu
        • He Whakaaro: The educational experiences of disabled learnersShow submenu
        • An evaluation of three programmes in the Innovations Funding PoolShow submenu
        • An examination of the links between parental educational qualifications, family structure & family wellbeing 1981-2006Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Introductory Professional Development Programme for Teacher Aides/KaiāwhinaShow submenu
        • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
        • He Whakaaro: What do we know about bullying behaviours in New Zealand?Show submenu
        • Learning Support Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2011 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2012 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2013 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2015 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2016 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2017 Learning Support Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2018 Learning Support Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
        • Annual Monitoring of Reading RecoveryShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2015 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2014 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2013 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2012 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2011 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2010 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2009 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2008 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2007 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2006 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2005 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2004 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2003 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2002 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2001 DataShow submenu
        • Patterns of student progress in the Intensive Wraparound ServiceShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand Students WellbeingShow submenu
        • Promoting positive race relations in New Zealand schools: Me Mahi TātouShow submenu
        • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
        • Review of the literature on individual education plansShow submenu
        • Resource teachers literacy: Operational & Policy ReviewShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilities: SummaryShow submenu
        • Student safety & well-being in school boarding accommodationShow submenu
        • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national survey 2007Show submenu
        • Thinking outside the square: Innovative ways to raise achievement for at risk studentsShow submenu
      • WorkforceShow submenu
        • Te Puni Rumaki: Strengthening the preparation, capability & retention of Māori-medium teacher trainees (2014)Show submenu
        • Report of the Māori-medium Workforce Reference Group into strengthening the Māori-medium Education workforce (2012)Show submenu
        • He Whakaaro: School principals in New ZealandShow submenu
        • A study of in-school facilitation in two Teacher Professional Development ProgrammesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Arts Professional Development Online in support of the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of the CAS Pilot ProjectShow submenu
        • An Evaluation of the CAS Pilot Project 2006-2007Show submenu
        • An Evaluation of the Language & Culture Immersion Experiences for Teachers ProgrammesShow submenu
        • An introduction to the concept of intercultural communicative language teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Analysis & use of student achievement dataShow submenu
        • Annual Evaluation Report for the Teach First NZ ProgrammeShow submenu
          • Final Evaluation Report for the Teach First NZ Programme PilotShow submenu
        • Beginning teachers 2000-2004Show submenu
        • Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako 2017 SurveyShow submenu
        • Education for sustainability in NZ schoolsShow submenu
        • Effective professional learning in physical activityShow submenu
        • Enhancing & igniting talent development initiativesShow submenu
        • Evaluation of professional development for Pacific teachers which supports the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Evaluation of teacher professional development languages (TPDL)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of Te Kōtahitanga Phase 5 (2010-2012)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Inservice Teacher Education Practice Project (INSTEP)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Introductory Professional Development Programme for Teacher Aides/KaiāwhinaShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Literacy Leadership Initiative: The Enhancement Programme 2001Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Literacy Professional Development ProjectShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Retention Pilot Programmes for Māori Medium Beginning TeachersShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Te Kauhua Māori Mainstream Pilot ProjectShow submenu
        • Evaluations of the 2006 Secondary Numeracy ProjectShow submenu
        • Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Projects 2006Show submenu
        • Formative evaluation of the Principal Recruitment AllowanceShow submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development English medium settingsShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Māori-mediumShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Samoan bilingual hubShow submenu
        • How effective is the current Resource Teacher Learning & Behaviour cluster model?Show submenu
        • Human resource issues in education: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • ICTPD Cluster ProgrammeShow submenu
          • National trends in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2003-2005Show submenu
          • National trends in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2004-2006Show submenu
          • National trends in teacher participation in ICTPD Clusters Programmes 1999-2006Show submenu
          • ICTPD through three lenses: An Evaluation of the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2001-2003Show submenu
          • ICTPD through three lenses: An Evaluation of the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2001-2003: SupplementShow submenu
        • Implementation of the Career Information & Guidance Policy in Schools: 1998 Follow-up StudyShow submenu
        • Improving english language outcomes for students receiving ESOL services in NZ SchoolsShow submenu
        • Incredible Years Teacher (IYT)Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher Evaluation SummaryShow submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 3Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 2Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 1Show submenu
        • Initial Teacher EducationShow submenu
          • Employment Based Initial Teacher Education Literature ReviewsShow submenu
          • Evaluation of exemplary post-graduate initial teacher education programmesShow submenu
          • Exemplary features & early outcomes: Second Interim ReportShow submenu
          • Dispositions to teach: Review & synthesis of current components & applications, & evidence of impactShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education: A summary of four studiesShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education: Policy & practiceShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education Outcomes: Standards for graduating teachersShow submenu
          • Learning to practiseShow submenu
          • Preliminary insights on Employment based initial teacher education in Māori-mediumShow submenu
          • Research on Initial Teacher Education in NZ 1993-2004Show submenu
          • Review of evidence: Features of effective Associate Teachers in programmes of initial teacher educationShow submenu
          • Review of evidence: Features of effective Associate Teachers in programmes of initial teacher education (Summary Report)Show submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: A profile of teachers who teach Year 7-10 students & their principalsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: How teachers & principals of Year 7-10 students use their timeShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: New Zealand student self-belief & confidence, & implications for achievementShow submenu
        • Instructed second language acquisition: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Intercultural communicative language teaching: Implications for effective teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Ki te Aotūroa: Improving inservice teacher educator learning & practiceShow submenu
        • Learning from the QTR&D ProgrammeShow submenu
        • Learning more about support staff in schoolsShow submenu
        • Literacy Professional Development Project: Identifying effective teaching & professional development practices for enhanced student learningShow submenu
        • Making a difference in the classroom: Effective teaching practice in low decile, multicultural schoolsShow submenu
        • Massey University Early Literacy Research ProjectShow submenu
        • Monitoring Teacher SupplyShow submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2014Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2013Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2012Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2011Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2010Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2009Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2008Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2007Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2006Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2005Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2004Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2003Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2002Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2001Show submenu
        • National Education Findings of Assess to Learn (AtoL) ReportShow submenu
        • Paraprofessional practice in ESOL programmes: Part 1Show submenu
        • Paraprofessional practice in ESOL programmes: Part 2Show submenu
        • Picking up the PaceShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading to LearnShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume II: Delivery of MathsShow submenu
        • Provision of school support servicesShow submenu
        • Raising Māori students' achievement in Te TaitokerauShow submenu
        • Recruitment & retention in New Zealand secondary schoolsShow submenu
        • Report on secondary teacher workload studyShow submenu
        • Review of secondary school's use of NCEA professional development resources 2005-06Show submenu
        • Review of the Specialist Classroom Teacher Pilot Full Report (2006)Show submenu
        • Review of the Specialist Classroom Teacher Pilot Summary Report (2006)Show submenu
        • School support staff: Collectively making resources countShow submenu
        • Shifting the Focus: Achievement information for professional learning: SummaryShow submenu
        • Status of Teachers ResearchShow submenu
          • Identifying Teacher Status, Its Impact & Recent Teacher Status InitiativesShow submenu
          • Perceptions of teachers & teaching: A focus on ECEShow submenu
          • Perceptions of Teachers & TeachingShow submenu
          • Perceptions of the Status of TeachersShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: Enterprised-based education & trainingShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • Te KōtahitangaShow submenu
        • Te Reo Māori in the Mainstream Professional Development (PD) Pilot Programmes for primary school teachers: An evaluationShow submenu
        • Te Toi HuarewaShow submenu
        • Teacher Census 2004Show submenu
        • Teacher-led Innovation FundShow submenu
        • Teaching, School & Principal Leadership Practices Survey 2018Show submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, the arts, & health & physical educationShow submenu
        • Teaching & learning in middle schooling: A review of the literatureShow submenu
        • Teaching of international languages in NZ schools in years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Full ReportShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • The effects of curricula & assessment on pedagogical approaches & on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • The sustainability of professional development in literacy: Part 1Show submenu
        • The sustainability of professional development in literacy: Part 2Show submenu
        • Using e-Learning to build workforce capability: A review of activitiesShow submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • Parents & WhānauShow submenu
        • Whānau Advisory Group Research ProjectShow submenu
        • An examination of the links between parental educational qualifications, family structure & family wellbeing 1981-2006Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Flaxmere Project: When families learn the language of schoolShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Home-School Partnership: Literacy ProgrammeShow submenu
        • Final report for the evaluation of the Parent Mentoring Project in ManukauShow submenu
        • National Standards: Survey of parents & whānau 2011Show submenu
        • Parents, families & whānau & their information needsShow submenu
        • Pacific Islands School Community Parent Liaison Project Case StudyShow submenu
        • Parent Mentoring Initiative EvaluationShow submenu
        • Raising Māori students' achievement in Te TaitokerauShow submenu
        • Successful Home-School PartnershipsShow submenu
        • The impact of family & community resources on student outcomesShow submenu
        • Whanau Toko I Te Ora: A Parenting Skills ProgrammeShow submenu
      • School Networks | SystemShow submenu
        • A census of providers of ESOL Programmes for international studentsShow submenu
        • A study of students’ transition from primary to secondary schoolingShow submenu
        • Alternative education: Literature review & report on key informants' experiencesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of three programmes in the Innovations Funding PoolShow submenu
        • Bilingual education in Aotearoa | New ZealandShow submenu
        • Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako 2017 SurveyShow submenu
        • Easing the transition from primary to secondary schoolingShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Partnership Schools | Kura Hourua PolicyShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Schools SupportShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Home-School Partnership: Literacy ProgrammeShow submenu
        • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
        • Evaluative study of co-located schoolsShow submenu
        • Export education in New Zealand: A strategic approach to developing the sector: An overviewShow submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development English medium settingsShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Māori-mediumShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Samoan bilingual hubShow submenu
        • How effective is the current Resource Teacher Learning & Behaviour cluster model?Show submenu
        • How much difference does it make? Notes on understanding, using, & calculating effect sizes for schoolsShow submenu
        • Improving english language outcomes for students receiving ESOL services in NZ SchoolsShow submenu
        • Innovations in Partnership Schools Kura HouruaShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilities: SummaryShow submenu
        • Involving children & young people in research in educational settingsShow submenu
        • Literature review & synthesis: Online Communities of PracticeShow submenu
        • Ministry of Education: Computer census reportShow submenu
        • Ngā Haeata o AotearoaShow submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2001/02 & Direction for 2003Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2000/01 & Direction for 2002Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2002/03Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2004Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2005Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2006/07Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2007/08Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2015/16Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata o Aotearoa 2019Show submenu
        • Ngā Kura o AotearoaShow submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (1999)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2000)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2001)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2002)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2003)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2004)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2005)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2006)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2007)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2008)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2009)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2010)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2011)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2012)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2013)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2014)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2015)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2016)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2017)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2018)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2019)Show submenu
        • OECD's Education at a GlanceShow submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2020Show submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2019Show submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2010Show submenu
          • Indicators Live: Education at a Glance 2009: Results for New ZealandShow submenu
          • Measuring up: How does New Zealand’s tertiary education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2008Show submenu
        • Prospect for international student enrolments in New Zealand: Profiles of 13 source countriesShow submenu
        • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
        • Review of future-focused research on teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Review of the Export Education LevyShow submenu
        • Review of the International Student LevyShow submenu
        • School staffing improvements: Evaluation of the impact of additional teaching staff provided through the School Staffing ReviewShow submenu
        • Staying at school consultation reportShow submenu
        • State of Education in NZShow submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand 2008Show submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand: 2006Show submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand: 2007Show submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative: The effects of school governance, ownership, organisation & management on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: The effect of school resourcing on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: Enterprised-based education & trainingShow submenu
        • Strengthening education in Mangere & OtaraShow submenu
        • Student safety & well-being in school boarding accommodationShow submenu
        • Students' transition between school & tertiary education: 2nd editionShow submenu
        • Successful Home-School PartnershipsShow submenu
        • Teaching & learning in middle schooling: A review of the literatureShow submenu
        • Teaching of international languages in NZ schools in years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • Te Rāngai Kāhui Ako ā-IwiShow submenu
        • The Case of EmilyShow submenu
        • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national surveyShow submenu
        • The impact of international students on domestic students & host institutionsShow submenu
        • The economic impact of export educationShow submenu
        • The economic impact of foreign fee -paying studentsShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Full ReportShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • Transition to secondary school: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Uptake & early implementation: Communities of Learning | Kāhui AkoShow submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • CurriculumShow submenu
        • All NMSSAShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019 English: Creating MeaningShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019 English: Making meaningShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019 English: Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Social StudiesShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Maths & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: The Arts - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Music - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Dance - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Drama - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Visual Arts - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015 English: Listening - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015 English: Viewing - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2012: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2012 English: WritingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2013: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2013 Mathematics & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Reading OverviewShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Reading ContextualShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Māori ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Pasifika ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Special Needs ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: OverviewShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: ContextualShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: MāoriShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: PasifikaShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: Special NeedsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Using Digital Technologies for Teaching & LearningShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Learning LanguagesShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: TechnologyShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017 Insights for Teachers: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017 Insights for Teachers: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018 Insights for Teachers: Maths & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018 Insights for Teachers: Social StudiesShow submenu
        • Literature Review: Innovative Teaching & Learning Practice for Māori-medium Education (2012)Show submenu
        • A constellation of prospects: A review of STAR (Secondary-Tertiary Alignment Resource)Show submenu
        • An evaluation of Arts Professional Development Online in support of the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning CommunitiesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning Communities: Technical ReportShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning Communities: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • An evaluation of professional development to support the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of the use & integration of readymade commercial literacy packages into classroom programmesShow submenu
        • An introduction to the concept of intercultural communicative language teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Assessing student swimming & aquatic skillsShow submenu
        • Bilingual | Immersion education: Indicators of good practiceShow submenu
        • Case studies of schools: Implementation of National CurriculumShow submenu
        • Curriculum implementation exploratory studies 2Show submenu
        • Curriculum implementation exploratory studies: Final ReportShow submenu
        • Curriculum, learning & effective pedagogy: A literature review in science educationShow submenu
        • Curriculum Stocktake: National School Sampling Study: Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementationShow submenu
        • Curriculum Stocktake: Report to Minister of Education September 2002Show submenu
        • Educators' use of the Online Learning CentreShow submenu
        • Effective professional learning in physical activityShow submenu
        • Environmental education in New Zealand schoolsShow submenu
        • Evaluation of professional development for Pacific teachers which supports the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Second Language Learning Funding Pool (1999-2003)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Secondary Schools Arts Co-ordinators Project to support the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Explaining & addressing gender differences in the New Zealand compulsory school sectorShow submenu
        • Feedback from schools on the draft document German in the New Zealand curriculum: A research reportShow submenu
        • Feedback from schools on the draft document French in the New Zealand curriculum: A research reportShow submenu
        • Implementation of the Career Information & Guidance Policy in Schools: 1998 Follow-up StudyShow submenu
        • Implementation of the New Zealand curriculum: Synthesis of research & evaluationShow submenu
        • Instructed second language acquisition: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Intercultural communicative language teaching: Implications for effective teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Language Acquisition ResearchShow submenu
        • New Zealand Stocktake: An international critiqueShow submenu
        • Monitoring & evaluating curriculum implementationShow submenu
        • Non-English-Speaking background students: A study of programmes & support in New Zealand schoolsShow submenu
        • Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective studyShow submenu
        • Questioning gender: Snapshots from explaining & addressing gender differences in the New Zealand compulsory school sectorShow submenu
        • Report on the New Zealand National Curriculum, 2002: Australian Council of Educational ResearchShow submenu
        • Review of future-focused research on teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Shifting balances: The impact of Level 1 NCEA on the teaching of Mathematics & ScienceShow submenu
        • Shifting Balances 2: The impact of the NCEA Implementation on the Teaching of Geography & Home EconomicsShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • Te Rau Awhina: Good practice examples of Māori & Pasifika private training establishmentsShow submenu
        • The effects of curricula & assessment on pedagogical approaches & on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • The structure of relationships between language-related factors, achievement-related beliefs, gender & beginning...Show submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, the arts, & health & physical educationShow submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, mathematics & technologyShow submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: English, languages, science & social studiesShow submenu
        • 'Walking the talk' matters in the use of evidence for transformative educationShow submenu
        • What makes for effective teacher professional development in ICT?Show submenu
      • Digital TechnologyShow submenu
        • A literature review focused on Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs)Show submenu
        • A Review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems...Show submenu
        • An Investigation into current e-learning activities in New Zealand Industry Training OrganisationsShow submenu
        • An investigation into factors that influence NZ Polytechnic | Institute of Technology tutors' uptake of e-LearningShow submenu
        • Approaches & implications of e-learning adoption on academic staff efficacy & working practiceShow submenu
        • Creating digital age learners through school ICT projects:Show submenu
        • Critical success factors for effective use of e-learning with Māori learnersShow submenu
        • Critical success factors for effective use of e-learning by Pacific learnersShow submenu
        • Critical success factors & effective pedagogy for e-learning in tertiary educationShow submenu
        • e-learning & implications for New Zealand schools: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Educators' use of the Online Learning CentreShow submenu
        • Equitable digital access to the internet beyond school: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Kaupapa Ara Whakawhiti Mātauranga (KAWM)Show submenu
        • Evaluations of student facing web-based servicesShow submenu
          • Any Questions (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • Any Questions (CORE Education Ltd)Show submenu
          • Studyit (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • Studyit (CORE Education)Show submenu
          • Final integrated report (CORE Education)Show submenu
          • Final integrated report (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • WickED (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • WickED (CORE Education)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Manaiakalani Digital Teaching AcademyShow submenu
        • Digital Opportunities PilotShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Digitally Boosted Study Support CentresShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Notebook ValleyShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Generation XPShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Project FarNet Learning Communities in the Far NorthShow submenu
          • Literature review for the evaluation of the Digital Opportunities ProjectsShow submenu
          • A Summary of the key findings of the Digital Opportunities Pilot ProjectsShow submenu
        • Global picture, local lessons: e-learning policy & accessibilityShow submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in schools (Years 4 to 6)Show submenu
        • Laptops for Teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in schools (Years 1 to 3)Show submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in Otago schoolsShow submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in Auckland schoolsShow submenu
        • Literacy teaching & learning in e-Learning contextsShow submenu
        • Literature review & synthesis: Online Communities of PracticeShow submenu
        • Measuring the worth of e-Learner support systemsShow submenu
        • National Education Network Trial ExtensionShow submenu
        • Ngā hangarau matihiko i ngā kura ara reo MāoriShow submenu
        • Outcomes for teachers & students in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2006-2008Show submenu
        • Outcomes for teachers & students in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2005-2007: A national overviewShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Digital readers at age 15Show submenu
        • School ICT Infrastructure SurveyShow submenu
        • School ICT Network Infrastructure Upgrade Project: Evaluation of Early ImpactsShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • TELA: Laptops for Teachers Evaluation: Final Report Years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • TELA: Laptops for Teachers Evaluation: Final Report Years 9-13Show submenu
        • TELA Laptops Scheme school survey 2013Show submenu
        • Towards digital enablement: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Using e-Learning to build workforce capability: A review of activitiesShow submenu
        • What makes for effective teacher professional development in ICT?Show submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • Large Scale International AssessmentsShow submenu
        • ICCS: NZ students' intentions towards participation in the democratic processesShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/2006 in New Zealand: An overview of national findingsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Student performance on open-ended questionsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Mathematics Year 5Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Mathematics Year 9Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Science Year 5Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Science Year 9 Show submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Performance assessment in TIMSS: New Zealand resultsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Science performance of NZ form 2 & 3 studentsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Mathematics performance of New Zealand form 2 & form 3 studentsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Mathematics & science literacy in the final year of schoolingShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06 in New Zealand: A summary of national findingsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06: A summary of findings for New ZealandShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06 Reading literacy in New Zealand: An overview of resultsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: Year 7-10 teachers' self-efficacy & job satisfactionShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 teachers' teaching & assessment practicesShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 Teaching WorkforceShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: School climate in New Zealand Year 7-10 schoolsShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 teachers' training & professional developmentShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: New Zealand Year 7-10 Teacher WellbeingShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Professional collaboration among New Zealand Year 7-10 teachersShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2006: New Zealand students' engagement with the PIRLS 2006 reading passagesShow submenu
        • ICCS: Participating & contributing? Show submenu
        • ICCS: What do New Zealand students understand about civic knowledge & citizenship?Show submenu
        • ICCS: What do our students think about New Zealand, democracy & freedom?Show submenu
        • PIRLS 2010/11 in New Zealand: An overview of findingsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2010/11 Reading literacy in New Zealand: A summary of findingsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2010/11 & PIRLS 2010/11 Key findings: New Zealand’s participation in PIRLS & TIMSSShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: New Zealand's AchievementShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Reading Literacy & the ClassroomShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Schools & school climate for learningShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Using computers for reading activities & students' attitudes to readingShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: The importance of access to books & NZ students' reading confidenceShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: Reading Literacy in New Zealand: Final ResultsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: Processes of reading comprehension: A summary of the resultsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: New Zealand's year 5 student achievement - SummaryShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: New Zealand's year 5 student achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Assessing knowledge & skills for life: New Zealand summaryShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on low socio-economic status students' achievement in reading literacyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on Māori achievement in reading literacyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on Pacific students achievement in reading LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Overview of selected New Zealand findingsShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: The New Zealand contextShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Learning for Tomorrow's World: NZ Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Learning for tomorrow’s world: BrochureShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Mathematics skills for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Problem solving for tomorrows' worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Reading skills for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Science skills for tomorrows' worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Student learning approaches for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: How ready are our 15-year-olds for tomorrow’s world?Show submenu
        • PISA 2006: Mathematical LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Reading LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: School context of science achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Scientific LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Student attitudes to & engagement with scienceShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading to LearnShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Digital readers at age 15Show submenu
        • PISA 2009: Our 21st century learners at age 15Show submenu
        • PISA 2009: Māori Students Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Pasifika Students Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: New Zealand student self-belief & confidence, & implications for achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: New Zealand financial literacy reportShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: New Zealand Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume I: Opportunities to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume II: Delivery of MathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume III: Student BehaviourShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume I: Student confidence & beliefs about their ability to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume II: How students approach learningShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume III: Why students are motivated to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume IV: What students think about schoolShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Top line results for New ZealandShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: What is PISAShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: Collaborative problem solvingShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand headline resultsShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand summary reportShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: The science context for PISAShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand Students WellbeingShow submenu
        • Maths achievement: What we know from NZ's participation in TIMSS 2014/15 & PISA 2015Show submenu
        • Science achievement: What we know from NZ's participation in TIMSS 2014/15 & PISA 2015Show submenu
        • PISA 2018: Global competence of New Zealand 15-year-oldsShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: NZ students' wellbeingShow submenu
        • PISA 2018 Opportunities to Learn: Learning time & school support for studyShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Reading in New ZealandShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Resources for learning: Access, quality & capacityShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Selecting & sorting studentsShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Uses of assessment, school accountability, & quality assuranceShow submenu
        • Reading achievement in NZ in 1990 & 2001: Results from IEA's Reading Literacy StudyShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: Preliminary achievement result Show submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: Trends in year 9 students' mathematics & science achievementShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: The school & classroom context for year 9 students' mathematics & science achievementShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2002/03: Maths & science achievement in NZ: Year 9Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2002/03: An overview of some key national year 5 & 9 student achievement resultsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: A profile of teachers who teach Year 7-10 students & their principalsShow submenu
    • PacificShow submenu
      • Action plan for Pacific Education 2020-2030Show submenu
      • Best practice for teaching Pacific learners: Pacific Evidence Brief 2019Show submenu
      • Literature review on the experiences of Pasifika learners in the classroomShow submenu
      • Research to understand the features of quality Pacific bilingual educationShow submenu
      • Teu Le Va: Relationships across research & policy in Pasifika educationShow submenu
      • Ua Aoina le Manogi o le Lolo: Pasifika schooling improvement research - Summary reportShow submenu
      • Ua Aoina le Manogi o le Lolo: Pasifika schooling improvement research - Final reportShow submenu
    • Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • Learning SupportShow submenu
      • Learning Support Coordinators Evaluation: Phase 1Show submenu
      • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
      • Education that fits: Review of international trends in the education of students with special educational needsShow submenu
      • Scoping support for NZ Sign Language users accessing the curriculum: Part IShow submenu
      • Summary of submissions in response to the Deaf Education Discussion Paper 2010Show submenu
      • Scoping support for NZ Sign Language users accessing the curriculum: Part IIShow submenu
      • Technical review of published research on applied behaviour analysis interventions for people with ASDShow submenu
      • The effectiveness of applied behaviour analysis interventions for people with ASDShow submenu
    • InternationalShow submenu
      • Destinations & employment outcomes of young, international graduatesShow submenu
      • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
      • Export education in New Zealand: A strategic approach to developing the sector: An overviewShow submenu
      • International capabilities: A summary report for schoolsShow submenu
      • International Students TrendsShow submenu
        • Foreign Fee-Paying Students in NZ: TrendsShow submenu
        • Foreign Fee-Paying Student Statistics to 2001Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2000-2006Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2001-2007Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2002-2008Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2003-2009Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2004-2010Show submenu
        • The NZ international education sector: Trends 1999-2004Show submenu
      • Internationalisation in New Zealand tertiary education organisationsShow submenu
      • Measuring New Zealand students' international capabilities: An exploratory studyShow submenu
      • Moving places: Destinations & earnings of international graduatesShow submenu
      • New Zealand Alumni Survey: Experiences, attitudes & engagementShow submenu
      • Prospect for international student enrolments in New Zealand: Profiles of 13 source countriesShow submenu
      • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
      • Research project on international student exchanges: Sending our students overseas (2008)Show submenu
      • Review of the International Student LevyShow submenu
      • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national surveyShow submenu
      • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national survey 2007Show submenu
      • The economic impact of export educationShow submenu
      • The economic impact of foreign fee -paying studentsShow submenu
      • The impact of international students on domestic students & host institutionsShow submenu
      • The satisfaction of international students in NZ unis & ITPsShow submenu
    • Publication SeriesShow submenu
  • Indicators Show submenu
  • Statistics Show submenu
    • Annual Monitoring Reading RecoveryShow submenu
    • AttendanceShow submenu
    • Attainment of 18-year-oldsShow submenu
    • Attendance under COVID-19Show submenu
    • Beyond StudyShow submenu
    • ECE FinancesShow submenu
    • ECE ParticipationShow submenu
    • ECE ServicesShow submenu
    • ECE StaffingShow submenu
    • Entering & leaving teaching (2004-2019)Show submenu
    • Fees-free Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • Financial Support for Tertiary StudentsShow submenu
    • Funding to SchoolsShow submenu
    • HomeschoolingShow submenu
    • Initial Teacher Education StatisticsShow submenu
    • International students in NZShow submenu
    • Language use in ECEShow submenu
    • Māori Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • NZ's Workplace-based LearnersShow submenu
    • Number of SchoolsShow submenu
    • Ongoing Resourcing SchemeShow submenu
    • Pacific Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • Per Student Funding for SchoolsShow submenu
    • Post-compulsory education & trainingShow submenu
    • School BoardsShow submenu
    • School Leaver DestinationsShow submenu
    • School Leaver's AttainmentShow submenu
    • School RollsShow submenu
    • School Subject EnrolmentShow submenu
    • Teacher NumbersShow submenu
    • Teacher TurnoverShow submenu
    • Tertiary Financial PerformanceShow submenu
    • Tertiary ParticipationShow submenu
    • Tertiary Population DataShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResearchShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResourcingShow submenu
    • Tertiary Retention & AchievementShow submenu
    • Tertiary Summary TablesShow submenu
    • Vocational Education & TrainingShow submenu
  • Topics Show submenu
    • BES Programme: Hei Kete RaukuraShow submenu
      • What's NewShow submenu
      • Rongohia te Hau: IntroShow submenu
        • 1. Using learner, whānau, & teacher feedbackShow submenu
        • 2. Different perspectives inform actionShow submenu
        • 3. Co-constructing a continuum of effective teaching practiceShow submenu
        • 4. Collecting evidence of pedagogyShow submenu
        • 5. The learning is in the conversationShow submenu
        • 6. Impacting Māori successShow submenu
        • 7. Racism: Taking those blinkers offShow submenu
        • NavigationShow submenu
      • Ta’ovala Learning from Pacific expertise in educationShow submenu
        • Teacher PreparationShow submenu
        • The Lesson LaunchShow submenu
        • Low Floor, High CeilingShow submenu
        • Deeper LearningShow submenu
        • Sharing BackShow submenu
        • The ConnectShow submenu
        • Deeper ThinkingShow submenu
        • Equity, ExcellenceShow submenu
        • School Leadership MattersShow submenu
      • Ambitious mathematics for young Pacific learners: IntroShow submenu
        • The LaunchShow submenu
        • Group WorkShow submenu
        • Sharing BackShow submenu
        • The ConnectShow submenu
      • School leadership for improvement in primary mathematics education:Show submenu
        • 1. Pedagogical Leadership – Preparation Year 0Show submenu
        • 2. Teachers Responding to the ChallengeShow submenu
        • 3. Building Social Competencies for Accelerated ImprovementShow submenu
        • 4. The Mathematics Communication & Participation Framework: Integrated ProgressionsShow submenu
        • 5. In-class mentoring for accelerated pedagogical improvementShow submenu
        • 6. Deep Change: Applied post-graduate studyShow submenu
        • 7. Collaborative lesson study for sustainabilityShow submenu
        • 8. Towards Kāhui Ako: Building learning communityShow submenu
        • 9. Family & community: Partners in changeShow submenu
        • 10. Russell School: The DifferenceShow submenu
      • Reading Together®Show submenu
        • Fairhaven SchoolShow submenu
        • St Joseph's School OtahuhuShow submenu
        • Manurewa Central SchoolShow submenu
        • ReadingTogether NavigationShow submenu
      • Using evidence for a step upShow submenu
      • Developing Mathematical Inquiry CommunitiesShow submenu
        • 01 Developing Mathematical Inquiry CommunitiesShow submenu
        • 02 A parent’s perspectiveShow submenu
        • 03 Strategic change leadership meetingShow submenu
        • 04 Mixed ability groupingShow submenu
        • 05 Problem & launchShow submenu
        • 06 Learning to listenShow submenu
        • 07 Teacher developmentShow submenu
        • 08 ImpactsShow submenu
        • 09 Group normsShow submenu
        • 10 Learning for lifeShow submenu
        • 11 Learning togetherShow submenu
        • 12 PerspectivesShow submenu
        • 13 It’s a journeyShow submenu
        • 14 Culturally responsive pedagogyShow submenu
        • 15 Fundamental shiftsShow submenu
        • DMIC NavigationShow submenu
      • ResourcesShow submenu
        • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
        • BESs & BES CasesShow submenu
          • Full List of BES CasesShow submenu
          • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
        • Summaries of BESsShow submenu
          • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
          • Full Set of BESsShow submenu
        • BES What Works SpotlightsShow submenu
          • Spotlight on Counter-Bullying PedagogiesShow submenu
          • Spotlight on Mathematics/PāngarauShow submenu
          • Spotlight on LeadershipShow submenu
          • The Use of Evidence in PolicyShow submenu
        • Te Kotahitanga eBook CollectionShow submenu
      • Evidence ExplainedShow submenu
        • Disciplined innovation for equity & excellence in education: Learning from Māori & Pasifika change expertiseShow submenu
          • What's NewShow submenu
        • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
      • About BESShow submenu
    • Dashboards & InfographicsShow submenu
      • DashboardsShow submenu
        • School Leavers DashboardShow submenu
        • Teacher WorkforceShow submenu
        • School Rolls DashboardShow submenu
        • Te Mataaho-a-Iwi | Education DashboardShow submenu
        • Disabled people & tertiary educationShow submenu
        • Adult Skills Regional ProfilesShow submenu
        • Tertiary Population DataShow submenu
        • Post-school labour-market outcomes of school based NCEAShow submenu
        • Post-compulsory education & trainingShow submenu
      • InfographicsShow submenu
        • School Leavers InfographicsShow submenu
        • Iwi InfographicsShow submenu
        • Employer SurveyShow submenu
        • Not Just about NEETsShow submenu
    • e-LearningShow submenu
    • International EducationShow submenu
    • Pacific EducationShow submenu
    • Māori Education & Te Reo MāoriShow submenu
    • Te Mātauranga Māori me Te Reo MāoriShow submenu
    • School Annual ReportsShow submenu
      • 2019 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2018 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2017 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2016 NZ Schools Financial Annual ReportsShow submenu
    • Student LoansShow submenu
      • Education Govt: InformationShow submenu
      • Stats NZ: Student LoansShow submenu
      • StudyLink: Student LoansShow submenu
      • Inland Revenue: Student LoansShow submenu
    • Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • WorkforceShow submenu
    • Communities of Learning | Kāhui AkoShow submenu
  • Data Services Show submenu
    • Code Sets & ClassificationsShow submenu
    • Collection FormsShow submenu
    • GuidelinesShow submenu
    • School Enrolment ZonesShow submenu
    • School SMS Roll Returns 2021Show submenu
    • SMS VendorsShow submenu
    • Glossary FilterShow submenu
    • International Data CollectionsShow submenu
      • ALLShow submenu
      • ICCSShow submenu
      • OECD's Education at a Glance & INESShow submenu
        • EAG PublicationsShow submenu
        • Education Indicators in FocusShow submenu
        • Online Education DatabaseShow submenu
        • OECD: Education GPSShow submenu
      • PIRLSShow submenu
      • PISAShow submenu
      • PIAACShow submenu
        • PIAAC Publications SummaryShow submenu
      • TALISShow submenu
      • TIMSSShow submenu
    • National Data CollectionsShow submenu
      • 18-Year-Olds with NCEA Level 2Show submenu
      • Annual ECE Child & Staff ReturnShow submenu
      • AttendanceShow submenu
      • Boards of TrusteesShow submenu
      • ECE ParticipationShow submenu
      • School FundingShow submenu
      • School LeaversShow submenu
      • School Roll ReturnShow submenu
      • School RollsShow submenu
      • Schooling WorkforceShow submenu
        • MethodologiesShow submenu
      • Suspension DataShow submenu

Site information

  • Site map
  • Contact us
  • Feedback
  • About this site
  • Glossary
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright, Legal & Privacy
  • Links
  • © Education Counts 2021
  • Ministry of Education logo.
  • New Zealand Government logo.
Scroll to top of page