Literacy evaluation reports and insights: BSLA, RR&ELS, Ready to Read Phonics Plus and accelerative structured approaches to literacy trials Publications
Publication Details
The Early Literacy Approach Evaluation: A snapshot covers the early implementation period (2021-2022) of three literacy initiatives known collectively as the Early Literacy Approach: Better Start Literacy Approach professional support (BSLA), Reading Recovery & Early Literacy Support (RR&ELS), and Ready to Read Phonics Plus books (R2RPP).
The Literacy and Communication Package Trial Final Evaluation Report evaluated three accelerative structured approaches to literacy initiatives for learners in Years 3–8. The trials took place during terms 2 to 4 of the 2022 school year.
The accompanying Ministry of Education commentary, Six Insights from the Early Literacy Approach and Literacy and Communication Trial evaluations, brings together key insights from the two evaluation reports. It also provides updated information since the evaluations ended in 2022, where relevant.
Author(s): Various
Date Published: April 2024
Key findings and insights
The Ministry commentary highlights that, broadly, the literacy initiatives evaluated showed evidence of:
- improvements in students’ literacy skills
- increases in the number of teachers using structured approaches to literacy
- improvements in teachers’ confidence and capability.
The commentary also draws out the following key insights from the evaluation reports:
- Persistent inequities are being addressed but more needs to be done to close gaps in foundational English skills completely. New data in the Ministry commentary shows gaps between ethnicities are closing after 30 weeks of BSLA teaching but are not completely closed.
- Intensive support is more effective and efficient if it is started sooner rather than later. Gaps are smaller when students are under 6 years old, and accelerative supports are effective at closing the gaps. When children are older, the gaps are larger, and more support is needed.
- The current system of tier 2 and 3 supports does not always provide appropriate levels of teaching intensity at the right time or for long enough. The current system of accelerative supports is time-limited, has limited capacity, and does not meet all literacy needs.
- Embedding effective, widespread change takes considerable time and support, and there are inherent tensions between fidelity and responsiveness. Changes to teacher practice can take several years to embed.
- Lack of common assessment tools and system-wide data make it difficult to measure overall impact. Because of the lack of consistent, normed assessment tools that cover the full breadth of literacy learning, it is difficult to get an objective assessment of the effectiveness and impact of different initiatives on different groups of learners.
- Specific features of the initiatives themselves appear likely to increase positive outcomes. Sufficient time is needed for teachers to gain the knowledge, skills, and confidence to change their teaching practice and sustain those changes, particularly for teachers of older students. Access to expertise and coaching, and the right resources and materials are other factors that enable success.
The views expressed in these reports are those of independent evaluators. While the data and analyses will inform design and implementation of literacy supports, the views in these reports are not necessarily those of the Ministry nor of the literacy initiative providers.
Navigation
Contact Us
If you have any questions about these publications please contact the National Enquiries mailbox:
Email: National Enquiries Mailbox