Enhancing and Igniting Talent Development Initiatives: Research to determine effectiveness

Publication Details

This report presents the findings from research involving five Talent Development Initiatives for improving outcomes for gifted and talented students or their teachers. The purpose of the research was to consider how well the objectives of each participating initiative had been achieved, how the initiative contributed to improved outcomes for gifted and talented learners or their teachers, and how planning to continue to meet the learners’ needs after 2008 had been considered.

Author(s): Tracy Riley and Roger Moltzen, Massey University. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Date Published: March 2010

Please consider the environment before printing the contents of this report.

This report is available as a download (please refer to the 'Downloads' inset box).  To view the individual chapters please refer to the 'Sections' inset box.  For links to related publications/ information that may be of interest please refer to the 'Where to Find Out More' inset box.


  • Belbin Associates. (2007-2008). Belbin team role theory. Retrieved February 9, 2009.
  • Betts, G. (1985). Autonomous Learner Model for the gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: ALPS.
  • Callahan, C. (2001). Evaluating learner and program outcomes in gifted education. In F.A. Karnes & S.M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 253-300). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Callahan, C.A., & Moon, T.R. (2003). Measuring important instructional outcomes for gifted students. Retrieved December 5, 2003
  • Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Davis, G., & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Delisle, J., & Galbraith, J. (2002). When gifted kids don't have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
  • Education Review Office. (2008). Schools' provisions for gifted and talented students. Wellington: Education Evaluation Reports.
  • Feldhusen, J.F., Hoover, S.M., & Sayler, M.F. (1989). Identification of gifted students at the secondary level. Monroe, NY: Trillium Press.
  • Gallagher, J.J. (1998). Accountability for gifted students. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(10), 739-743.
  • Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. In S.Kemmis & R.McTaggart (Eds.), The Action Research Reader. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Victoria: Deakin University.
  • Maker, C.J. (1993). Gifted students in the regular classroom: What practices are defensible and feasible? In C.J. Maker & D. Orzechowski-Harland (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education, volume III (pp. 413-436). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • McAlpine, D. (2000) Assessment and the gifted. Tall Poppies, 25 (1). Retrieved July 15, 2003
  • McAlpine, D. (2004). The identification of gifted and talented students. In D. McAlpine & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 93-132). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
  • McAlpine, D., & Reid, N. (1996). Teacher observation scales for identifying children with special abilities. Wellington: NZCER.
  • Ministry of Education. (2000). Gifted and talented students: Meeting their needs in New Zealand schools. Wellington: Learning Media.
  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Initiatives in gifted and talented education. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Ministry of Education Working Party on Gifted Education. (2001). Report to the Minister of Education. Retrieved February 3, 2009.
  • National Association for Gifted Children. (2003). Using tests to identify gifted students. Retrieved 1 June 2003.
  • Reid, N. (2004). Evaluation of programmes. In D. McAlpine, & R. Moltzen (Eds.), Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives (pp. 377-390). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
  • Reis, S.M., & Renzulli, J.S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 128-134
  • Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  • Riley, T., Bevan-Brown, J., Bicknell, B., Carroll-Lind, J., & Kearney, A. (2004). The extent, nature, and effectiveness of identification and provisions for New Zealand gifted and talented students. Final report. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Robinson, A., Shore, B., & Enersen, D. (2007). Best Practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
  • Schraw, G. and Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
  • Slavin, R.E. (1988). Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Leadership, September, 67-77.
  • Taylor, S. (2000). Assessment and evaluation. Retrieved September 15, 2003.
  • Tomlinson, C., Bland, L., Moon, T., & Callahan, C. A. (1993). Evaluation utilization: A review of the literature with implications for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(2), 171-189.
  • Tomlinson. C., & Callahan, C.M. (1994). Planning effective evaluations for programs for the gifted. Roeper Review, 17(1), 46-52.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. The Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, XIII(2), 67-72.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004a). Metaevaluation findings: A call for gifted program quality. In J.VanTassel-Baska & A.X.Feng (Eds.), Designing and utilising evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp.227-256). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004b). Introduction to the William and Mary Eclectic Model of Gifted Program Evaluation. In J.VanTassel-Baska & A.X.Feng (Eds.), Designing and utilising evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp.1-22). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004c). The processes in gifted program evaluation. In J.VanTassel-Baska & A.X.Feng (Eds.), Designing and utilising evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp.1-22). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • VanTassel-Baska, J., & Feng, A. (2007). The development and use of a structured teacher observation scale to assess differentiated best practice. Roeper Review, 19(2), 89-92.
  • Vialle, W., & Quigley, S. (2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted? Gifted and Talented International, 17(2), 85–90.
  • Wadsworth, D. (1997). Everyday evaluation on the run (2nd ed.) Australia: Allen & Unwin.
  • Watts, M., & Watts, D. (1993). Teacher research, action research: The logo action research collaborative. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 35-63.
  • Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict and underachievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Winebrenner, S. (2000). Gifted students need an education, too. Educational Leadership, September, 52-56
  • Winner, E. (1996b). The miseducation of our gifted children. Education Week, 16(7), 44.
  • Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Zeigler, A., & Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical research studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11(2), 113-136.