Education Counts

Page navigation links

  • Education Counts Logo
  • Skip to Primary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to Secondary Navigation Menu
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to content

Site Search

Site Search

Site navigation menus

  • Know your Region
  • Communities of Learning
  • Find your nearest school
  • Early Learning Services
  • Directories
  • Publications
  • Indicators
  • Statistics
  • Topics
  • Data Services

Search the education counts website

Find pages with

Narrow results by:

Evaluation of literacy and mathematics additional learning programmes for students 2011 Publications

Publication Details

This research report outlines the findings of an evaluation of the Literacy and Mathematics: Programmes for Students 2011, a Ministry of Education initiative to provide additional teacher time to enable selected schools to organise programmes for students who were assessed as ‘below’ or ‘well below’ the National Standards in mathematics, reading or writing. This initiative allowed a primary or intermediate school to design programmes in mathematics, reading or writing for a group of students to work intensively with a selected teacher.

Author(s): Bronwen Cowie, Clive McGee, Mira Peter, Merilyn Taylor and Junjun Chen, University of Waikato.

Date Published: November 2012

Executive Summary

The focus of this evaluation was to investigate the impacts of these programmes upon student achievement (and to look particularly at Māori and Pasifika student achievement) teaching approaches and how the programmes influenced school-wide teaching and learning. The evaluation was from June to December 2011 and, during the project, researchers and Ministry research and curriculum personnel worked together to shape the evaluation.

The programmes

The 2011 literacy and mathematics programmes for students were:

  1. Reading in Year 1: Shared book/language experience to supplement guided reading for students at risk of not achieving National Standards after one year at school.
  2. Reading in Year 2: Intensive and responsive teaching of reading for students at risk of not achieving the National Standards in reading.
  3. Writing in Years 4 to 8 for students who were 'below' or 'well below' National Standards in writing.
  4. Reading and writing for English language learners.
  5. Mathematics for Years 3 to 8 students who were 'below' or 'well below' National Standards (Accelerating Achievement in Mathematics – ALiM).
  6. Mathematics for Years 3 to 8 students who were 'below' or 'well below' National Standards and were taught by Specialist Mathematics Teachers (SMT).

Schools selected the programme related to the area of focus for their students. Some schools took part in more than one programme. The first five programmes were taught for 10 weeks and the SMT programme was taught for 15 weeks.

The main aim of the programmes was to accelerate learning for a small group of students who were judged as 'below' or 'well below' National Standards. Accelerated learning was defined as occurring when the amount of a student's learning in reading, writing or mathematics increased by more than the amount expected in the equivalent time in the regular classroom programme. That is, if reading, writing and ALiM (maths) 10-week programmes (or the SMT maths programme of 15 weeks) resulted in greater progress than would be expected, learning was assessed as accelerated.

Participating schools

Schools were selected by regional Ministry of Education offices, with input from mathematics facilitators, literacy advisors and professional learning development (PLD) providers. Priority was given to schools with high percentages of Māori, Pasifika or English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) students who were achieving below expectations. Schools selected for the programmes were expected to have:/p>*

  • effective classroom teaching and learning occurring
  • students identified as operating 'below' or 'well below' National Standards
  • school leadership actively supporting teacher learning and innovation
  • effective classroom teachers.

Within the schools principals were asked to select teachers for their expertise in working with low achieving students and for their willingness and ability to respond to student learning needs.

Students who were 'below' or 'well below' National Standards were selected for the programmes. Consideration was also given to the likelihood the student would benefit from the intensive programme and from working in a small group. Other selection criteria applied by schools included regular attendance and ability to work in a group.

Programmes were run throughout 2011. Planning meetings were held prior to the start of the programmes by the Ministry of Education to brief teachers and principals on the intentions of the programmes.

Evaluation methodology

The evaluation sought to determine the extent to which student learning was 'accelerated' as a result of their participation in the programmes and what pedagogical practices had contributed to any gains.

The research questions for the evaluation were:

  1. To what extent have the programmes in reading, writing, mathematics and English language learning accelerated learning for programme students?
  2. To what extent have the programmes accelerated learning specifically by Māori, Pasifika and students with special learning needs?
  3. What factors contributed to the success of programmes in terms of student achievement and teaching approaches?
  4. How responsive to the needs of students was the teaching, including any differences across the targeted groups?
  5. How well did teachers of the different programmes design and deliver learning plans to students?
  6. To what extent did a more responsive pedagogical approach better meet the needs of students and did teachers change their usual teaching practices during the programmes?
  7. Have reading, writing and mathematics programmes been influenced by other current or recent Ministry activities?

Data collection

A mixed methods approach to data collection was used. Data sources were: online surveys, student achievement data, interviews and case studies.
Data were sought for this evaluation from all schools involved in programmes during Term 3 2011 (n=240 schools: 94 involved in literacy programmes, 146 in mathematics).

  • Principals and teachers: Online surveys were emailed to principals and teachers at the start and at the end of the programmes.
  • Students: Online attitude surveys were completed with students at the start and at the end of the programme.
  • Case study schools: There were 25 case study schools, among these: 11 had mathematics programmes (nine ALiM and two SMT schools); 15 schools had literacy programmes: four had Year 1 reading; five had Year 2 reading; seven had writing in Years 4-8, and there was one English Language Learning school.

Student achievement data: collected pre and post programme

  • Mathematics: Progressive Achievement Test (PAT): Mathematics test at the appropriate level and Numeracy Project Assessment – Diagnostic Interview (NumPA)
  • Reading: Observation Survey, instructional text reading levels and Overall Teacher Judgement (OTJ)
  • Writing: asTTle writing and Overall Teacher Judgement.


Data were analysed for the students in the study and three ethnic groups of students—New Zealand European, Māori and Pasifika. Reading data were submitted by 52 per cent of schools (122 students). Writing data were submitted by 63 per cent of schools (320 students). For ALiM maths schools, PAT data was available for 559 students and 642 students for NumPA. For SMT maths schools, PAT data was available for 252 students and Numpa data for 371 students.

Measuring student progress from short-term interventions is complex and challenging, particularly when using the assessment tools currently available. In this evaluation a variety of measures were used to estimate whether progress for students was accelerated. In some cases the sample sizes are small and some findings, particularly for the ethnic groups, should be considered as indicative only. Further work is needed to develop better measures of progress and acceleration in short-term interventions.

Evaluation findings

Key findings

  1. The majority of mathematics, reading and writing students accelerated their learning during the programmes, that is, their achievement increased more in the programmes than would be expected in the equivalent classroom time. In reading, nearly two-thirds of the students improved in relation to the National Standards. In writing, students, on average, improved by at least one level on the asTTle test. In the ALiM maths programme the majority of students gained at least one framework stage over the 10 weeks.
  2. Māori, Pasifika and New Zealand European student groups increased their learning in reading and writing. In mathematics, Māori students recorded a significantly higher increase in the scale score than the other two groups for PAT, and Pasifika students recorded the greatest stage increase across all the Numeracy Framework domains.
  3. Key elements in the organisation of the programmes were identified and should inform future programmes, eg, small groups, targeted teaching, sessions longer than 30 minutes, at least four lessons a week, responsive teaching, planning and reflection, focus on and use of data.
  4. Teacher reflection, planning and preparation was iterative and adaptive to respond to student learning as it evolved. These factors were linked to increases in student achievement in reading, writing and mathematics.
  5. Leadership from principals was essential to the programme. Principals played an important role in ensuring there was support for the programme teacher, commitment to the programme and for spreading positive programme outcomes more widely in the school during the programme and beyond it.
  6. Principals and programme teachers of the mathematics, reading and writing had high expectations that they would accelerate the learning of most programme students.
  7. The small group design of the programmes fostered and enabled safe and more frequent interaction amongst students and with the teacher.
  8. Ministry planning and follow-up days for teachers played an important role in setting expectations and accountability for the programmes, disseminating successful outcomes and initiating a community of interest focused around raising the achievement of students who were achieving 'below' or 'well below' expectations.

School organisation for the programmes

In schools there were two main organisational forms or models developed for the programmes; either groups were withdrawn to a separate space or groups were taught in the classroom. The particular teaching arrangements varied; the teacher of the intervention was sometimes the students' regular teacher and sometimes not. In some schools, more than one teacher was involved in the programme. This was more likely to be the case in the literacy schools.

Programmes were organised and run differently across the schools. In maths, three-quarters of the SMT and ALiM programmes were taught four or five times a week. Half of the SMT teachers ran lessons of more that 30 minutes and three-quarters of ALiM teachers' lessons were 30 minutes or more. Over 80 per cent of the reading programmes and 79 per cent of writing programmes had at least four or five lessons per week; 62 per cent of the writing lessons and 35 per cent of the reading lessons were over 30 minutes in duration and half the reading teachers ran 16-30 minute lessons.

It appeared that frequent teaching in lessons over 30 minutes was linked to improved learning outcomes because students could engage in clearly linked, cumulative and focused learning activities over a longer time.

Student achievement

A key aspect of this evaluation was to measure the extent to which the programmes in reading, writing, and mathematics accelerated learning for all students and for Māori and Pasifika students. Data were analysed for the whole student group and three ethnic groups of students—New Zealand European, Māori and Pasifika. Group means showed that all three ethnic groups had comparable levels of achievement change on the various assessment measures for reading, writing, and mathematics.

Reading and writing

The results showed that overall, students achievement in reading and writing improved and this was accelerated. Māori, Pasifika and New Zealand European students all made accelerated progress in terms of group mean scores, that is, they made more progress than they usually would have in the same time.

Reading

In reading, student achievement data were gathered using the Observation Survey, Running Records and an Overall Teacher Judgement against the National Standard.

At the beginning of the programmes almost all reading students (92 out of 95) were rated 'well below' or 'below' the National Standard for reading. At the end of the programmes nearly two-thirds of the ratings teachers gave students from the three ethnic groups improved in relation to the National Standard, eg, improved from 'well below' to 'below' or 'below' to 'at'. At the end of the programmes over a third (n=27) of students were rated 'at' or 'above' the National Standard.
Sixty-one per cent of Year 1 and 68 per cent of Year 2 students improved by two or more colour levels on the Ready to Read colour wheel indicating accelerated learning in the 10-week programmes.

Writing

In writing, pre and post student achievement data was collected using asTTle writing and Overall Teacher Judgement. Analysis of achievement scores showed that the majority of students accelerated their learning over the programmes.

At the end of the programmes, writing achievement of New Zealand European, Māori, Pasifika students improved, on average, by at least one level on the asTTle test.

At the beginning of the programmes almost all students were rated 'well below' or 'below' the National Standard for writing. At the end over half of the programme teachers' ratings of the students in relation to the National Standard had improved eg, ratings had improved from 'well below' to 'below' or 'below' to 'at'.

Mathematics

In mathematics progress and acceleration for student achievement data was assessed using PAT scale scores and changes in group means in the Numeracy Framework domains using NumPA. Overall, across the measures the change in group means were such that student learning can be considered accelerated.

In ALiM and SMT, the PAT scale score and percentage yearly growth group means for the whole group and each of the Māori, Pasifika and New Zealand European groups significantly increased from pre to post programme.
NumPA results showed a significant increase in group means in all domains for both ALiM and SMT from pre to post assessment. The majority of students made a gain of at least one framework stage over the 10 weeks of the ALiM programmes. This compares with the findings from the Numeracy Development Project (Young-Loveridge 2010) where students at stages 4 or 5 would be likely to move a stage in a year. For SMT participants, growth over the 15-week programme was similar to what would be expected for 27 weeks.
Students who began the programmes at a lower stage of the Number Framework tended to make more progress, on average, than those who started at higher stages. This might be expected as steps at the lower stages are smaller and easier to progress through.

The effect sizes for Māori and Pasifika students were higher than that for New Zealand European students.  Pasifika students recorded the greatest stage change growth across all domains in the Numeracy Framework.
The PAT data showed all three ethnic groups made significant gains in PAT scores from beginning to end of the programmes. The average change for each group was comparable and progress was similar, irrespective of starting point across the three ethnicities. Year 4 students showed the average greatest growth in PAT scale score, suggesting the programme may be of particular value to this group.

In the SMT programme, the Year 4 students showed the greatest change as measured in average scale score in PAT mathematics scale score. Growth over the 15-week programme was similar to what would be expected for 27 weeks.

To get an estimate of progress for students participating in ALiM compared to their progress prior to ALiM, PAT data was collected from a small number of schools. Student progress over Terms 1 and 2 was compared to progress over the ALiM programme (Term 3). Data from the 32 students showed significantly greater increases in PAT scale scores over the ALiM programme compared to progress in the two terms prior to the programme. While the results should be interpreted cautiously because of the small numbers, they suggest the programmes did accelerate students' learning at a greater rate than previously.

Māori students

On all of the test and assessment measures Māori students as a group made accelerated progress at a similar rate to Pasifika and New Zealand European students in the reading, writing, and ALiM and SMT mathematics programmes.

In ALiM, the effect sizes for PAT measures for Māori and Pasifika students were comparable, and greater than for the New Zealand European student group. The ALiM Māori student group recorded the highest movement in PAT scale score mean and experienced significantly greater progress than New Zealand European students (not Pasifika) when calculated by percentage of usual yearly growth.

Pasifika students

On all of the assessment measures Pasifika students as a group made accelerated progress in reading, writing, ALiM and SMT programmes. Half of the Pasifika students reached the expected reading level on the National Standard, although the sample was small. Teachers also judged Pasifika students to have improved in relation to the National Standard in writing, eg, ratings increased from 'well below' to 'below' and for some from 'well below' to 'at' the National Standard. Pasifika students recorded the greatest stage change growth across all the domains of the Numeracy Framework.

New Zealand European students

The New Zealand European students as a group accelerated their learning on all of the assessment average change measures.

Programme design elements

These literacy and mathematics achievement results show that, on average, students had accelerated their learning in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of the programmes. The results are consistent with: high expectations and accountability, planning and commitment from those involved, responsiveness, support and reflection time. The programme elements are discussed below.

Planning, reflection, expectations and commitment

The results from the achievement data are consistent with high expectations that principals and teachers had before the programmes began with, that student learning would increase more than it usually would in the equivalent time. Principals and teachers across the schools made a strong commitment to improve student learning. This commitment appeared to come from the way the programmes were set up at the national level through the provision of teacher time for planning and briefing; time for preparation, teaching and reflection; and pre and follow-up sharing of teaching and learning outcomes and an expectation to report back on progress. There was a sense that schools as a whole made a commitment to make the programmes work and to embed positive influences into the programme teacher's own ongoing teaching and across the school.

Programme teachers planned their programmes and kept regular records of day-to-day modifications to plans. Ongoing reflection on formative assessment information informed iterative cycles of responsive planning. Information on student ideas and responses, especially formative assessment, were often shared with a student's regular teacher, with lead teachers in reading, in particular, playing an active role in fostering this communication, as well as helping teachers to refine their practice.

The daily planning and preparation was important to be able to be flexible, responsive and react to the learning that had gone before. Teacher and principal surveys conducted at the end of the programmes reported that students had made more or much more progress than usual. Maths teachers felt gains made during the programmes would be sustained, if at a lesser rate.

Support for teachers

Principals were expected to provide support for the programme teachers and they played a key role in organising satisfactory spaces, resources, scheduling and ensuring there was colleague support for planning and teaching.

In many schools the programmes were seen as a collective responsibility. The allocation of teacher time and the expectation to report back after the end of the programmes combined with commitment and enthusiasm to work to make the programmes successful for the students. Teachers and principals also mentioned the benefits for themselves and the schools in taking part in the programmes, such as adaptations to practice and use of data.

Within the reading and writing programme, another teacher (lead teacher, syndicate leader) frequently acted as a colleague in support or 'critical friend', especially for less experienced teachers. Reading and writing teachers found the most useful support came from the lead literacy teacher as a mentor, literacy advisors and Reading Recovery teachers. Mathematics teachers were provided with professional support from an external facilitator as part of the ALiM and SMT programmes. On the whole, maths teachers found the facilitators to be supportive, to be able to suggest new ideas and provide guidance. Teachers felt collegial support was also a contributor to the success of the programmes.

Strong principal leadership in terms of priority and organisation within the school was important to the success of the programmes. Most principals had high expectations for the programmes and this seemed to create a sense of urgency in teachers to raise student achievement. Most principals also initiated processes to extend any benefits from the programmes to other teachers in a school and many programme teachers were required to share their experiences, especially with the regular teachers of the programme students.

Culturally responsive teaching

How teachers taught was of major importance in this evaluation. Strong encouragement was given to teachers in planning days prior to the programmes to use teaching that was responsive to students' needs and in particular to practice culturally responsive pedagogy. Teachers were given background information and presentations on effective and responsive teaching. Pre-programme survey data showed that most teachers were able to describe aspects of their classroom teaching that were effective and responsive to students' cultural/ethnic characteristics and background. In general, they cited high expectations of students, knowledge of each student and a classroom where all students were included and valued. In post surveys, teachers cited changes they made to their general teaching for different students, such as tailoring the topics of lessons to student interest and catering for particular learning preferences.

Post-survey teacher data and teacher interviews showed that teachers, in general, used their usual teaching approaches but made specific adaptations for individual students based on the students' particular learning needs. Providing focused, individualised attention that was planned and adapted for students was likely to have been different from the daily classroom practice with a larger group of students.

Teachers themselves had mixed views about how they changed their teaching approach to better suit the Māori and Pasifika students in their groups. Teachers reported that they tended to teach all students in the group in a similar way to their usual classroom teaching because there are certain teaching approaches they know to be effective. On the other hand, teachers reported how they had changed specific approaches to suit Māori and Pasifika students, such as choice of reading books, letting each child choose writing topics that interested them and greater use of games and discussion about mathematical ideas. Teachers reported the importance of getting to know all programme students quickly and responding to what students were learning.

ALiM teachers found use of materials and equipment, a variety of approaches, discussion with peers, forming relationships and structured programmes were effective teaching approaches for these students. SMT teachers found working in small groups, modelling, using equipment and encouraging student talk to be effective strategies with their groups of students.

Family/whānau involvement

Most school plans for implementing the programmes emphasised the importance of family/whānau involvement. Almost all principals and teachers reported informing parents of the programme and many invited parents to visit schools to observe lessons and some ran group information sessions. Over the whole group, a large majority of teachers believed that parents and family/whānau were supportive of the programmes and in case study schools only a small minority of parents did not engage when invited to, such as help learning at home. It was not possible to measure the impact upon learning of parental support; however, almost all teachers interviewed in case study schools believed student achievement and attitudes were helped by family/whānau involvement and support.

Actual parental involvement varied across the schools. It was common for schools to advise the whānau/family the student was part of the programme, for activities to be sent home and to invite whānau/family to evenings or to view lessons, to varying degrees of success.

In the interviews and the surveys ALiM and SMT teachers identified support from home as a factor contributing to the success of the programmes.

Student experiences of the programmes

Overall, students enjoyed their time on the programmes and in some cases could identify activities that had helped their learning. In the post-programme surveys, nearly all students reported positive learning experiences in the programmes. Many, even the younger readers, could identify learning activities that helped their reading, writing or mathematics. Students reported enjoyment of the small group setting owing to fewer distractions. Students felt special to be part of the group and grew more confident. The student surveys showed positive changes in attitudes from the start to the end of the programmes as confidence, motivation, and engagement increased.

Mathematics students said they played more interactive mathematical games, used more materials and artefacts and had more discussions with peers. They thought they had gained confidence and motivation and had learned better than in their usual classroom; and they rated themselves as better at mathematics by the end of the programme. Many literacy students were able to identify particular strategies and learning skills that had been emphasised and to explain how they helped their reading or writing. The strategies and skills were not usually new; rather, they were given more emphasis in the group setting, such as systematically building vocabulary for use in writing. There was evidence from students that the changes the teachers made had helped their learning. Many reading students gave examples of learning improvements, like writing more interesting stories, being able to read higher-level books or understanding mathematical concepts and patterns.
ALiM and SMT teachers reported shifts in students' enjoyment, motivation and engagement over the duration of the programmes. Students reported increasing their enjoyment of the subjects and gaining confidence while on the programmes.

Sustainability

Principals who took part in data collection were convinced about the value of the programmes and many were looking for ways to spread the positive outcomes from the programmes school-wide. All principals' case study schools had either already begun to widen the impact across a part or all of the school or had plans to achieve a wider impact in the school in future. Principals and teachers saw advantages to the programme teacher being a regular member of staff and the classroom teacher of students in the programme. This was owing to existing relationships between students and teachers and the ability to capitalise on programme gains in the classroom more easily.

Many schools began to widen the reach of the programmes for sustainability by linking the programme teacher to other teachers. Programme teachers reported sharing their learning across the school, with many intending to formalise these processes. Teachers saw the knowledge and experience of working with the group as a valuable learning experience and many were taking approaches applied during the programmes to inform practice in their classrooms.

Staff meetings and teacher syndicates were being used as vehicles for influencing other teachers across the school in terms of changing classroom teaching to help students who were below learning expectations. Nearly all ALiM and SMT teachers shared learning and effective teaching practices with other teachers in their schools. Principals of ALiM and SMT teachers felt programme teacher sharing had positively influenced other teachers and students in their schools.

Elements of successful programmes

There was evidence that teachers were practising elements of culturally responsive pedagogy from teachers' self-report of their approaches and their plans for teaching and student feedback. We could not demonstrate causal links between responsive teaching and student achievement or rank the importance of particular teaching approaches. However, there were indicators that some teaching approaches and elements of the programme model were very important in improving student achievement, including the target groups of Māori and Pasifika.

These successful approaches were:

  • systematic, detailed and responsive daily and weekly teacher planning
  • support, commitment and leadership from the principal
  • regular, uninterrupted small-group teaching of at least four lessons per week
  • lessons that were more than 30 minutes
  • focus on the specific learning skills and concepts required to learn to read and/or write and to learn mathematics
  • focus on specific curriculum content at a suitable learning level
  • effective and responsive teacher
  • regular assessment, feedback to students, planning and record keeping
  • teacher and principal enthusiasm and high expectations
  • family/whānau participation in helping children's learning
  • learning activities that capture student interest, make learning enjoyable and extend their learning
  • regular reflection of their own teaching by programme teachers.

Of the above, the crucial factors appear to be detailed planning, lesson length of at least 30 minutes and frequent lessons, focus on particular curriculum content (but no pressure to cover a prescribed amount) detailed and regular feedback to students and teacher expectation and enthusiasm.

More broadly, teachers who were supported were more effective in implementing these successful approaches. Principals needed to be involved in teacher and student selection, support and resources for the teacher. They needed to organise active collegial planning of the programme and arrange the sharing of programme experiences with a student's regular teacher.

With the above factors in place, Māori and Pasifika students experienced success in the programmes and their learning was accelerated. The students were generally positive about the extra help they received and their achievement scores indicated that, on the whole, their learning had benefited. Changes in students' attitudes were consistent with the accelerated learning achieved by the majority.

In summary, the above factors interacted and together constituted effective and responsive teaching.

Concluding comment

This evaluation provides evidence that the additional learning programmes for groups of primary students in mathematics, reading and writing resulted in accelerated learning for the majority of the programme students not achieving National Standards at the start of the programmes.

School principals and teachers demonstrated a sense of accountability to succeed in raising student achievement. They saw benefits in a model that set out a clear goal and parameters for the programmes.

At the school level, principals and teachers worked within the parameters and resources of the programmes to use their own initiative and expertise to promote student learning and meet national level expectations.
Principals and teachers relished working within the high trust model and were empowered when they saw gains in student motivation, engagement and achievement. Programme teachers were keen to share what they had learned with colleagues, who responded positively to local evidence of the progress students could make. Programme students were positive about their experiences, reporting they had valued participating in the programmes and that their learning had benefited. Finally, school leaders saw the need to widen the positive effects of the programme of teaching and learning to other teachers and students across a school and many had already introduced processes to pursue this goal beyond the programme itself.

Overall, looking at the student achievement data and the teacher, principal and student surveys, the reading, writing and mathematics programmes were effective at raising student achievement for students not achieving National Standards. The surveys, case studies and interview also provide evidence for changes in students' attitudes and changes to teachers' practice.

The picture for the literacy programmes is less conclusive than for mathematics owing to the smaller sample of consistent student achievement data available for analysis. However, for both writing and reading, on average, students made progress on the measures provided. Principal, teacher and student surveys and case study feedback suggest these programmes were also effective in raising student achievement for students not achieving National Standards.

Navigation

Downloads

  • Full Report (PDF, 1.3 MB)
  • Full Report (DOC, 3.0 MB)

Where to find out more

  • Programmes for students 2012: Report on three evaluative...
  • Achievement analysis 2014 programmes for students
  • Mathematics Support Teacher (MST) Programme 2014...

Contact Us

Education Data Requests
If you have any questions about education data then please contact us at:
Email:      Requests EDK
Phone:    +64 4 463 8065

Home Close Menu
  • Know your Region Show submenu
  • Communities of Learning Show submenu
  • Find your nearest school Show submenu
    • Find Your Nearest SchoolShow submenu
  • Early Learning Services Show submenu
  • Directories Show submenu
    • API Early Childhood & SchoolsShow submenu
      • School Directory APIShow submenu
    • Early Childhood ServicesShow submenu
    • Māori Medium SchoolsShow submenu
    • New Zealand SchoolsShow submenu
    • Tertiary ProvidersShow submenu
      • Careers NZShow submenu
    • School Mergers, Closures & NewShow submenu
      • Directories HomepageShow submenu
    • Enrolling at your local schoolShow submenu
  • Publications Show submenu
    • Early Childhood EducationShow submenu
      • Annual ECE Census 2020: Fact SheetsShow submenu
      • He Whakaaro: How participation in early learning is affected by COVID-19Show submenu
      • OECD's Education at a GlanceShow submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2020Show submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2019Show submenu
        • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2010Show submenu
        • Indicators Live: Education at a Glance 2009: Results for New ZealandShow submenu
        • Measuring up: How does New Zealand’s tertiary education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2008Show submenu
      • Early childhood education centre-based parent support & development: Final reportShow submenu
      • Effective learning in early childhood education?Show submenu
      • Evaluation of the sustainability of ECE services during the implementation of Pathways to the Future: Ngā Huarahi AratakiShow submenu
      • Impact of 20 Hours ECE on playcentres 2008Show submenu
      • Literature review: Transition from early childhood education to schoolShow submenu
      • Outcomes of early childhood education: Literature reviewShow submenu
      • Quality early childhood education for under 2-year-oldsShow submenu
    • MāoriShow submenu
      • Māori-medium EducationShow submenu
        • A literature review focused on Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs)Show submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • Te piko o te māhuri, tērā te tupu o te rākau: language & literacy in marae-based programmesShow submenu
        • Te Piko o te Māhuri: The key attributes of successful Kura Kaupapa MāoriShow submenu
        • Te Piko o te Māhuri: Ngā āhuatanga matua o te Kura Kaupapa Māori whai angituShow submenu
        • Toitū te Reo: Evaluation of Tāiki E!, Haumi E!, Toi te Kupu & Eke PanukuShow submenu
      • English medium EducationShow submenu
        • Hangaia te mātāpuna o te mōhia: learning foundations for Māori adultsShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Te Kotahitanga: 2004-2008Show submenu
        • Hei titiro anō i te whāinga: Māori achievement in bachelors degrees revisitedShow submenu
        • Mā te huruhuru ka rere te manu: how can language & literacy be optimised for Māori learner success?Show submenu
        • Summary of the Evaluation of Te Kotahitanga: 2004-2008Show submenu
      • Māori & English mediumShow submenu
        • Te pakeke hei ākonga: Māori adult learnersShow submenu
    • SchoolingShow submenu
      • LearnersShow submenu
      • Learning Support & WellbeingShow submenu
        • An evaluation of three programmes in the Innovations Funding PoolShow submenu
        • An examination of the links between parental educational qualifications, family structure & family wellbeing 1981-2006Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Introductory Professional Development Programme for Teacher Aides/KaiāwhinaShow submenu
        • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
        • He Whakaaro: What do we know about bullying behaviours in New Zealand?Show submenu
        • Learning Support Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2011 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2012 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2013 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2015 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2016 Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2017 Learning Support Client Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
          • 2018 Learning Support Satisfaction SurveyShow submenu
        • Annual Monitoring of Reading RecoveryShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2015 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2014 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2013 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2012 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2011 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2010 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2009 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2008 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2007 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2006 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2005 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2004 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2003 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2002 DataShow submenu
          • Annual Monitoring of Reading Recovery: 2001 DataShow submenu
        • Patterns of student progress in the Intensive Wraparound ServiceShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand Students WellbeingShow submenu
        • Promoting positive race relations in New Zealand schools: Me Mahi TātouShow submenu
        • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
        • Review of the literature on individual education plansShow submenu
        • Resource teachers literacy: Operational & Policy ReviewShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilities: SummaryShow submenu
        • Student safety & well-being in school boarding accommodationShow submenu
        • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national survey 2007Show submenu
        • Thinking outside the square: Innovative ways to raise achievement for at risk studentsShow submenu
      • WorkforceShow submenu
        • A study of in-school facilitation in two Teacher Professional Development ProgrammesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Arts Professional Development Online in support of the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of the CAS Pilot ProjectShow submenu
        • An Evaluation of the CAS Pilot Project 2006-2007Show submenu
        • An Evaluation of the Language & Culture Immersion Experiences for Teachers ProgrammesShow submenu
        • An introduction to the concept of intercultural communicative language teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Analysis & Use of Student Achievement DataShow submenu
        • Annual Evaluation Report for the Teach First NZ ProgrammeShow submenu
          • Final Evaluation Report for the Teach First NZ Programme PilotShow submenu
        • Beginning teachers 2000-2004Show submenu
        • Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako 2017 SurveyShow submenu
        • Education for sustainability in NZ schoolsShow submenu
        • Effective professional learning in physical activityShow submenu
        • Enhancing & igniting talent development initiativesShow submenu
        • Evaluation of professional development for Pacific teachers which supports the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Evaluation of teacher professional development languages (TPDL)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of Te Kōtahitanga Phase 5 (2010-2012)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Inservice Teacher Education Practice Project (INSTEP)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Introductory Professional Development Programme for Teacher Aides/KaiāwhinaShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Literacy Leadership Initiative: The Enhancement Programme 2001Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Literacy Professional Development ProjectShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Retention Pilot Programmes for Māori Medium Beginning TeachersShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Te Kauhua Māori Mainstream Pilot ProjectShow submenu
        • Evaluations of the 2006 Secondary Numeracy ProjectShow submenu
        • Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Projects 2006Show submenu
        • Formative evaluation of the Principal Recruitment AllowanceShow submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development English medium settingsShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Māori-mediumShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Samoan bilingual hubShow submenu
        • How effective is the current Resource Teacher Learning & Behaviour cluster model?Show submenu
        • Human resource issues in education: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • ICTPD Cluster ProgrammeShow submenu
          • National trends in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2003-2005Show submenu
          • National trends in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2004-2006Show submenu
          • National trends in teacher participation in ICTPD Clusters Programmes 1999-2006Show submenu
          • ICTPD through three lenses: An Evaluation of the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2001-2003Show submenu
          • ICTPD through three lenses: An Evaluation of the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2001-2003: SupplementShow submenu
        • Implementation of the Career Information & Guidance Policy in Schools: 1998 Follow-up StudyShow submenu
        • Improving english language outcomes for students receiving ESOL services in NZ SchoolsShow submenu
        • Incredible Years Teacher (IYT)Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher Evaluation SummaryShow submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 3Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 2Show submenu
          • Incredible Years-Teacher NZCER Evaluation Report 1Show submenu
        • Initial Teacher EducationShow submenu
          • Employment Based Initial Teacher Education Literature ReviewsShow submenu
          • Evaluation of exemplary post-graduate initial teacher education programmesShow submenu
          • Exemplary features & early outcomes: Second Interim ReportShow submenu
          • Dispositions to teach: Review & synthesis of current components & applications, & evidence of impactShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education: A summary of four studiesShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education: Policy & practiceShow submenu
          • Initial Teacher Education Outcomes: Standards for graduating teachersShow submenu
          • Learning to practiseShow submenu
          • Preliminary insights on Employment based initial teacher education in Māori-mediumShow submenu
          • Research on Initial Teacher Education in NZ 1993-2004Show submenu
          • Review of evidence: Features of effective Associate Teachers in programmes of initial teacher educationShow submenu
          • Review of evidence: Features of effective Associate Teachers in programmes of initial teacher education (Summary Report)Show submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: A profile of teachers who teach Year 7-10 students & their principalsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: How teachers & principals of Year 7-10 students use their timeShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: New Zealand student self-belief & confidence, & implications for achievementShow submenu
        • Instructed second language acquisition: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Intercultural communicative language teaching: Implications for effective teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Ki te Aotūroa: Improving inservice teacher educator learning & practiceShow submenu
        • Learning from the Quality Teaching Research & Development Programme (QTR&D)Show submenu
        • Learning more about support staff in schoolsShow submenu
        • Literacy Professional Development Project: Identifying effective teaching & professional development practices for enhanced student learningShow submenu
        • Making a difference in the classroom: Effective teaching practice in low decile, multicultural schoolsShow submenu
        • Massey University Early Literacy Research ProjectShow submenu
        • Monitoring Teacher SupplyShow submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2014Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2013Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2012Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2011Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2010Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2009Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2008Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2007Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2006Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2005Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2004Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2003Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2002Show submenu
          • Monitoring Teacher Supply 2001Show submenu
        • National Education Findings of Assess to Learn (AtoL) ReportShow submenu
        • Paraprofessional practice in ESOL programmes: Part 1Show submenu
        • Paraprofessional practice in ESOL programmes: Part 2Show submenu
        • Picking up the PaceShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading to LearnShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume II: Delivery of MathsShow submenu
        • Provision of school support servicesShow submenu
        • Raising Māori students' achievement in Te TaitokerauShow submenu
        • Recruitment & retention in New Zealand secondary schoolsShow submenu
        • Report on secondary teacher workload studyShow submenu
        • Review of secondary school's use of NCEA professional development resources 2005-06Show submenu
        • Review of the Specialist Classroom Teacher Pilot Full Report (2006)Show submenu
        • Review of the Specialist Classroom Teacher Pilot Summary Report (2006)Show submenu
        • School support staff: Collectively making resources countShow submenu
        • Shifting the Focus: Achievement information for professional learning: SummaryShow submenu
        • Status of Teachers ResearchShow submenu
          • Identifying Teacher Status, Its Impact & Recent Teacher Status InitiativesShow submenu
          • Perceptions of teachers & teaching: A focus on ECEShow submenu
          • Perceptions of Teachers & TeachingShow submenu
          • Perceptions of the Status of TeachersShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: Enterprised-based education & trainingShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • Te KōtahitangaShow submenu
        • Te Reo Māori in the Mainstream Professional Development (PD) Pilot Programmes for primary school teachers: An evaluationShow submenu
        • Te Toi HuarewaShow submenu
        • Teacher Census 2004Show submenu
        • Teacher-led Innovation FundShow submenu
        • Teaching, School & Principal Leadership Practices Survey 2018Show submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, the arts, & health & physical educationShow submenu
        • Teaching & learning in middle schooling: A review of the literatureShow submenu
        • Teaching of international languages in NZ schools in years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Full ReportShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • The effects of curricula & assessment on pedagogical approaches & on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • The sustainability of professional development in literacy: Part 1Show submenu
        • The sustainability of professional development in literacy: Part 2Show submenu
        • Using e-Learning to build workforce capability: A review of activitiesShow submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • Parents & WhānauShow submenu
        • An examination of the links between parental educational qualifications, family structure & family wellbeing 1981-2006Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Flaxmere Project: When families learn the language of schoolShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Home-School Partnership: Literacy ProgrammeShow submenu
        • Final report for the evaluation of the Parent Mentoring Project in ManukauShow submenu
        • National Standards: Survey of parents & whānau 2011Show submenu
        • Parents, families & whānau & their information needsShow submenu
        • Pacific Islands School Community Parent Liaison Project Case StudyShow submenu
        • Parent Mentoring Initiative EvaluationShow submenu
        • Raising Māori students' achievement in Te TaitokerauShow submenu
        • Successful Home-School PartnershipsShow submenu
        • The impact of family & community resources on student outcomesShow submenu
        • Whanau Toko I Te Ora: A Parenting Skills ProgrammeShow submenu
      • School Networks | SystemShow submenu
        • A census of providers of ESOL Programmes for international studentsShow submenu
        • A study of students’ transition from primary to secondary schoolingShow submenu
        • Alternative education: Literature review & report on key informants' experiencesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of three programmes in the Innovations Funding PoolShow submenu
        • Bilingual education in Aotearoa | New ZealandShow submenu
        • Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako 2017 SurveyShow submenu
        • Easing the transition from primary to secondary schoolingShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Partnership Schools | Kura Hourua PolicyShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Schools SupportShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Home-School Partnership: Literacy ProgrammeShow submenu
        • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
        • Evaluative study of co-located schoolsShow submenu
        • Export education in New Zealand: A strategic approach to developing the sector: An overviewShow submenu
        • From Targeting Problems to Tailoring PotentialShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development English medium settingsShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Māori-mediumShow submenu
        • High level executive summary: Quality teaching, research & development Samoan bilingual hubShow submenu
        • How effective is the current Resource Teacher Learning & Behaviour cluster model?Show submenu
        • How much difference does it make? Notes on understanding, using, & calculating effect sizes for schoolsShow submenu
        • Improving english language outcomes for students receiving ESOL services in NZ SchoolsShow submenu
        • Innovations in Partnership Schools Kura HouruaShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
        • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilities: SummaryShow submenu
        • Involving children & young people in research in educational settingsShow submenu
        • Literature review & synthesis: Online Communities of PracticeShow submenu
        • Ministry of Education: Computer census reportShow submenu
        • Ngā Haeata o AotearoaShow submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2001/02 & Direction for 2003Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2000/01 & Direction for 2002Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2002/03Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2004Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2005Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2006/07Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2007/08Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata Mātauranga: Annual Report on Māori Education 2015/16Show submenu
          • Ngā Haeata o Aotearoa 2019Show submenu
        • Ngā Kura o AotearoaShow submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (1999)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2000)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2001)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2002)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2003)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2004)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2005)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2006)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2007)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2008)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2009)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2010)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2011)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2012)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2013)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2014)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2015)Show submenu
          • New Zealand Schools: Ngā Kura o Aotearoa (2016)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2017)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2018)Show submenu
          • Ngā Kura o Aotearoa: New Zealand Schools (2019)Show submenu
        • OECD's Education at a GlanceShow submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2020Show submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2019Show submenu
          • How does New Zealand's education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2010Show submenu
          • Indicators Live: Education at a Glance 2009: Results for New ZealandShow submenu
          • Measuring up: How does New Zealand’s tertiary education system compare? OECD's Education at a Glance 2008Show submenu
        • Prospect for international student enrolments in New Zealand: Profiles of 13 source countriesShow submenu
        • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
        • Review of future-focused research on teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Review of the Export Education LevyShow submenu
        • Review of the International Student LevyShow submenu
        • School staffing improvements: Evaluation of the impact of additional teaching staff provided through the School Staffing ReviewShow submenu
        • Staying at school consultation reportShow submenu
        • State of Education in NZShow submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand 2008Show submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand: 2006Show submenu
          • State of Education in New Zealand: 2007Show submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative: The effects of school governance, ownership, organisation & management on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: The effect of school resourcing on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • Strategic Research Initiative Literature Review: Enterprised-based education & trainingShow submenu
        • Strengthening education in Mangere & OtaraShow submenu
        • Student safety & well-being in school boarding accommodationShow submenu
        • Students' transition between school & tertiary education: 2nd editionShow submenu
        • Successful Home-School PartnershipsShow submenu
        • Teaching & learning in middle schooling: A review of the literatureShow submenu
        • Teaching of international languages in NZ schools in years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • Te Rāngai Kāhui Ako ā-IwiShow submenu
        • The Case of EmilyShow submenu
        • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national surveyShow submenu
        • The impact of international students on domestic students & host institutionsShow submenu
        • The economic impact of export educationShow submenu
        • The economic impact of foreign fee -paying studentsShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Full ReportShow submenu
        • The education of Years 7 to 10 students: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • Transition to secondary school: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Uptake & early implementation: Communities of Learning | Kāhui AkoShow submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • CurriculumShow submenu
        • All NMSSAShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2019 English: Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Social StudiesShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018: Maths & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: The Arts - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Music - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Dance - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Drama - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Visual Arts - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015 English: Listening - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015 English: Viewing - Key FindingsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2015: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2012: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2012 English: WritingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2013: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2013 Mathematics & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Reading OverviewShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Reading ContextualShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Māori ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Pasifika ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 English: Special Needs ReadingShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: OverviewShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: ContextualShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: MāoriShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: PasifikaShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Social Studies: Special NeedsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2014 Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Using Digital Technologies for Teaching & LearningShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Technical InformationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: Learning LanguagesShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2016: TechnologyShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017 Insights for Teachers: ScienceShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2017 Insights for Teachers: Health & Physical EducationShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018 Insights for Teachers: Maths & StatisticsShow submenu
          • NMSSA 2018 Insights for Teachers: Social StudiesShow submenu
        • A constellation of prospects: A review of STAR (Secondary-Tertiary Alignment Resource)Show submenu
        • An evaluation of Arts Professional Development Online in support of the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning CommunitiesShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning Communities: Technical ReportShow submenu
        • An evaluation of Network Learning Communities: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • An evaluation of professional development to support the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • An evaluation of the use & integration of readymade commercial literacy packages into classroom programmesShow submenu
        • An introduction to the concept of intercultural communicative language teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Assessing student swimming & aquatic skillsShow submenu
        • Bilingual | Immersion education: Indicators of good practiceShow submenu
        • Case studies of schools: Implementation of National CurriculumShow submenu
        • Curriculum implementation exploratory studies 2Show submenu
        • Curriculum implementation exploratory studies: Final ReportShow submenu
        • Curriculum, learning & effective pedagogy: A literature review in science educationShow submenu
        • Curriculum Stocktake: National School Sampling Study: Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementationShow submenu
        • Curriculum Stocktake: Report to Minister of Education September 2002Show submenu
        • Educators' use of the Online Learning CentreShow submenu
        • Effective professional learning in physical activityShow submenu
        • Environmental education in New Zealand schoolsShow submenu
        • Evaluation of professional development for Pacific teachers which supports the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Evaluation of the Second Language Learning Funding Pool (1999-2003)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Secondary Schools Arts Co-ordinators Project to support the Arts in the New Zealand curriculumShow submenu
        • Explaining & addressing gender differences in the New Zealand compulsory school sectorShow submenu
        • Feedback from schools on the draft document German in the New Zealand curriculum: A research reportShow submenu
        • Feedback from schools on the draft document French in the New Zealand curriculum: A research reportShow submenu
        • Implementation of the Career Information & Guidance Policy in Schools: 1998 Follow-up StudyShow submenu
        • Implementation of the New Zealand curriculum: Synthesis of research & evaluationShow submenu
        • Instructed second language acquisition: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Intercultural communicative language teaching: Implications for effective teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Language Acquisition ResearchShow submenu
        • New Zealand Stocktake: An international critiqueShow submenu
        • Monitoring & evaluating curriculum implementationShow submenu
        • Non-English-Speaking background students: A study of programmes & support in New Zealand schoolsShow submenu
        • Preventing negative Matthew effects in at-risk readers: A retrospective studyShow submenu
        • Questioning gender: Snapshots from explaining & addressing gender differences in the New Zealand compulsory school sectorShow submenu
        • Report on the New Zealand National Curriculum, 2002: Australian Council of Educational ResearchShow submenu
        • Review of future-focused research on teaching & learningShow submenu
        • Shifting balances: The impact of Level 1 NCEA on the teaching of Mathematics & ScienceShow submenu
        • Shifting Balances 2: The impact of the NCEA Implementation on the Teaching of Geography & Home EconomicsShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • Te Rau Awhina: Good practice examples of Māori & Pasifika private training establishmentsShow submenu
        • The effects of curricula & assessment on pedagogical approaches & on educational outcomesShow submenu
        • The structure of relationships between language-related factors, achievement-related beliefs, gender & beginning...Show submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, the arts, & health & physical educationShow submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: General curriculum, mathematics & technologyShow submenu
        • Teachers' experiences in curriculum implementation: English, languages, science & social studiesShow submenu
        • 'Walking the talk' matters in the use of evidence for transformative educationShow submenu
        • What makes for effective teacher professional development in ICT?Show submenu
      • Digital TechnologyShow submenu
        • A literature review focused on Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs)Show submenu
        • A Review of the literature on computer-assisted learning, particularly integrated learning systems...Show submenu
        • An Investigation into current e-learning activities in New Zealand Industry Training OrganisationsShow submenu
        • An investigation into factors that influence NZ Polytechnic | Institute of Technology tutors' uptake of e-LearningShow submenu
        • Approaches & implications of e-learning adoption on academic staff efficacy & working practiceShow submenu
        • Creating digital age learners through school ICT projects:Show submenu
        • Critical success factors for effective use of e-learning with Māori learnersShow submenu
        • Critical success factors for effective use of e-learning by Pacific learnersShow submenu
        • Critical success factors & effective pedagogy for e-learning in tertiary educationShow submenu
        • e-learning & implications for New Zealand schools: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Educators' use of the Online Learning CentreShow submenu
        • Equitable digital access to the internet beyond school: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Evaluation of Kaupapa Ara Whakawhiti Mātauranga (KAWM)Show submenu
        • Evaluations of student facing web-based servicesShow submenu
          • Any Questions (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • Any Questions (CORE Education Ltd)Show submenu
          • Studyit (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • Studyit (CORE Education)Show submenu
          • Final integrated report (CORE Education)Show submenu
          • Final integrated report (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • WickED (Nielsen/NetRatings)Show submenu
          • WickED (CORE Education)Show submenu
        • Evaluation of the Manaiakalani Digital Teaching AcademyShow submenu
        • Digital Opportunities PilotShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Digitally Boosted Study Support CentresShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Notebook ValleyShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Generation XPShow submenu
          • Evaluation of Project FarNet Learning Communities in the Far NorthShow submenu
          • Literature review for the evaluation of the Digital Opportunities ProjectsShow submenu
          • A Summary of the key findings of the Digital Opportunities Pilot ProjectsShow submenu
        • Global picture, local lessons: e-learning policy & accessibilityShow submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in schools (Years 4 to 6)Show submenu
        • Laptops for Teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in schools (Years 1 to 3)Show submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in Otago schoolsShow submenu
        • Laptops for teachers: An evaluation of the TELA scheme in Auckland schoolsShow submenu
        • Literacy teaching & learning in e-Learning contextsShow submenu
        • Literature review & synthesis: Online Communities of PracticeShow submenu
        • Measuring the worth of e-Learner support systemsShow submenu
        • National Education Network Trial ExtensionShow submenu
        • Outcomes for teachers & students in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2006-2008Show submenu
        • Outcomes for teachers & students in the ICTPD School Clusters Programme 2005-2007: A national overviewShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Digital readers at age 15Show submenu
        • School ICT Infrastructure SurveyShow submenu
        • Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: An NZ perspectiveShow submenu
        • TELA: Laptops for Teachers Evaluation: Final Report Years 7 & 8Show submenu
        • TELA: Laptops for Teachers Evaluation: Final Report Years 9-13Show submenu
        • TELA Laptops Scheme school survey 2013Show submenu
        • Towards digital enablement: A literature reviewShow submenu
        • Using e-Learning to build workforce capability: A review of activitiesShow submenu
        • What makes for effective teacher professional development in ICT?Show submenu
        • Whaia te iti Kahurangi: NZCER EvaluationShow submenu
      • Large Scale International AssessmentsShow submenu
        • ICCS: NZ students' intentions towards participation in the democratic processesShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/2006 in New Zealand: An overview of national findingsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Student performance on open-ended questionsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Mathematics Year 5Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Mathematics Year 9Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Science Year 5Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2018/19: Science Year 9 Show submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Performance assessment in TIMSS: New Zealand resultsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Science performance of NZ form 2 & 3 studentsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Mathematics performance of New Zealand form 2 & form 3 studentsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1994: Mathematics & science literacy in the final year of schoolingShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06 in New Zealand: A summary of national findingsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06: A summary of findings for New ZealandShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2005/06 Reading literacy in New Zealand: An overview of resultsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: Year 7-10 teachers' self-efficacy & job satisfactionShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 teachers' teaching & assessment practicesShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 Teaching WorkforceShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: School climate in New Zealand Year 7-10 schoolsShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Year 7-10 teachers' training & professional developmentShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: New Zealand Year 7-10 Teacher WellbeingShow submenu
        • TALIS 2018: Professional collaboration among New Zealand Year 7-10 teachersShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2006: New Zealand students' engagement with the PIRLS 2006 reading passagesShow submenu
        • ICCS: Participating & contributing? Show submenu
        • ICCS: What do New Zealand students understand about civic knowledge & citizenship?Show submenu
        • ICCS: What do our students think about New Zealand, democracy & freedom?Show submenu
        • PIRLS 2010/11 in New Zealand: An overview of findingsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2010/11 Reading literacy in New Zealand: A summary of findingsShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2010/11 & PIRLS 2010/11 Key findings: New Zealand’s participation in PIRLS & TIMSSShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: New Zealand's AchievementShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Reading Literacy & the ClassroomShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Schools & school climate for learningShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: Using computers for reading activities & students' attitudes to readingShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2016: The importance of access to books & NZ students' reading confidenceShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: Reading Literacy in New Zealand: Final ResultsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: Processes of reading comprehension: A summary of the resultsShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: New Zealand's year 5 student achievement - SummaryShow submenu
        • PIRLS 2001: New Zealand's year 5 student achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Assessing knowledge & skills for life: New Zealand summaryShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on low socio-economic status students' achievement in reading literacyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on Māori achievement in reading literacyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Focus on Pacific students achievement in reading LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: Overview of selected New Zealand findingsShow submenu
        • PISA 2000: The New Zealand contextShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Learning for Tomorrow's World: NZ Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Learning for tomorrow’s world: BrochureShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Mathematics skills for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Problem solving for tomorrows' worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Reading skills for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Science skills for tomorrows' worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2003: Student learning approaches for tomorrow’s worldShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: How ready are our 15-year-olds for tomorrow’s world?Show submenu
        • PISA 2006: Mathematical LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Reading LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: School context of science achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Scientific LiteracyShow submenu
        • PISA 2006: Student attitudes to & engagement with scienceShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading to LearnShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Digital readers at age 15Show submenu
        • PISA 2009: Our 21st century learners at age 15Show submenu
        • PISA 2009: Māori Students Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Pasifika Students Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • PISA 2009: Reading WorkbookShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: New Zealand student self-belief & confidence, & implications for achievementShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: New Zealand financial literacy reportShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: New Zealand Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume I: Opportunities to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume II: Delivery of MathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on the Learning Environment Volume III: Student BehaviourShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume I: Student confidence & beliefs about their ability to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume II: How students approach learningShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume III: Why students are motivated to learn mathsShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Series on Learners Volume IV: What students think about schoolShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: Top line results for New ZealandShow submenu
        • PISA 2012: What is PISAShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: Collaborative problem solvingShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand headline resultsShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand summary reportShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: The science context for PISAShow submenu
        • PISA 2015: New Zealand Students WellbeingShow submenu
        • Maths achievement: What we know from NZ's participation in TIMSS 2014/15 & PISA 2015Show submenu
        • Science achievement: What we know from NZ's participation in TIMSS 2014/15 & PISA 2015Show submenu
        • PISA 2018: Global competence of New Zealand 15-year-oldsShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: NZ students' wellbeingShow submenu
        • PISA 2018 Opportunities to Learn: Learning time & school support for studyShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Reading in New ZealandShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Resources for learning: Access, quality & capacityShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Selecting & sorting studentsShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Summary ReportShow submenu
        • PISA 2018: Uses of assessment, school accountability, & quality assuranceShow submenu
        • Reading achievement in NZ in 1990 & 2001: Results from IEA's Reading Literacy StudyShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: Preliminary achievement result Show submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: Trends in year 9 students' mathematics & science achievementShow submenu
        • TIMSS 1998/99: The school & classroom context for year 9 students' mathematics & science achievementShow submenu
        • TIMSS 2002/03: Maths & science achievement in NZ: Year 9Show submenu
        • TIMSS 2002/03: An overview of some key national year 5 & 9 student achievement resultsShow submenu
        • Insights for Teachers: A profile of teachers who teach Year 7-10 students & their principalsShow submenu
    • PacificShow submenu
      • Literature review on the experiences of Pasifika learners in the classroomShow submenu
      • Teu Le Va: Relationships across research & policy in Pasifika educationShow submenu
      • Ua Aoina le Manogi o le Lolo: Pasifika schooling improvement research - Summary reportShow submenu
      • Ua Aoina le Manogi o le Lolo: Pasifika schooling improvement research - Final reportShow submenu
      • Action plan for Pacific Education 2020-2030Show submenu
      • Best practice for teaching Pacific learners: Pacific Evidence Brief 2019Show submenu
      • Research to understand the features of quality Pacific bilingual educationShow submenu
    • Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • Learning SupportShow submenu
      • Integrated effective service provision for children & young people with physical disabilitiesShow submenu
      • Education that fits: Review of international trends in the education of students with special educational needsShow submenu
      • Scoping support for NZ Sign Language users accessing the curriculum: Part IShow submenu
      • Summary of submissions in response to the Deaf Education Discussion Paper 2010Show submenu
      • Scoping support for NZ Sign Language users accessing the curriculum: Part IIShow submenu
      • Technical review of published research on applied behaviour analysis interventions for people with ASDShow submenu
      • The effectiveness of applied behaviour analysis interventions for people with ASDShow submenu
    • InternationalShow submenu
      • Destinations & employment outcomes of young, international graduatesShow submenu
      • Evaluation Report on the Implementation of the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (2002/03)Show submenu
      • Export education in New Zealand: A strategic approach to developing the sector: An overviewShow submenu
      • International capabilities: A summary report for schoolsShow submenu
      • International Students TrendsShow submenu
        • Foreign Fee-Paying Students in NZ: TrendsShow submenu
        • Foreign Fee-Paying Student Statistics to 2001Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2000-2006Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2001-2007Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2002-2008Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2003-2009Show submenu
        • International student enrolments in NZ 2004-2010Show submenu
        • The NZ international education sector: Trends 1999-2004Show submenu
      • Internationalisation in New Zealand tertiary education organisationsShow submenu
      • Measuring New Zealand students' international capabilities: An exploratory studyShow submenu
      • Moving places: Destinations & earnings of international graduatesShow submenu
      • New Zealand Alumni Survey: Experiences, attitudes & engagementShow submenu
      • Prospect for international student enrolments in New Zealand: Profiles of 13 source countriesShow submenu
      • Report on research into the circumstances of very young international students in New ZealandShow submenu
      • Research project on international student exchanges: Sending our students overseas (2008)Show submenu
      • Review of the International Student LevyShow submenu
      • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national surveyShow submenu
      • The experiences of international students in New Zealand: Report on the results of the national survey 2007Show submenu
      • The economic impact of export educationShow submenu
      • The economic impact of foreign fee -paying studentsShow submenu
      • The impact of international students on domestic students & host institutionsShow submenu
      • The satisfaction of international students in NZ unis & ITPsShow submenu
    • Publication SeriesShow submenu
  • Indicators Show submenu
  • Statistics Show submenu
    • Annual Monitoring Reading Recovery: 2018 DataShow submenu
    • Attainment of 18-year-oldsShow submenu
    • Attendance under COVID-19Show submenu
    • Beyond StudyShow submenu
    • ECE FinancesShow submenu
    • ECE ParticipationShow submenu
    • ECE ServicesShow submenu
    • ECE StaffingShow submenu
    • Entering & leaving teaching (2004-2019)Show submenu
    • Fees-free Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • Financial Support for Tertiary StudentsShow submenu
    • Funding to SchoolsShow submenu
    • HomeschoolingShow submenu
    • Initial Teacher Education StatisticsShow submenu
    • International students in NZShow submenu
    • Language use in ECEShow submenu
    • Māori Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • NZ's Workplace-based LearnersShow submenu
    • Number of SchoolsShow submenu
    • Ongoing Resourcing SchemeShow submenu
    • Pacific Language in SchoolingShow submenu
    • Per Student Funding for SchoolsShow submenu
    • Post-compulsory education & trainingShow submenu
    • Schooling Boards of TrusteesShow submenu
    • School Leaver DestinationsShow submenu
    • School Leaver's AttainmentShow submenu
    • School RollsShow submenu
    • School Subject EnrolmentShow submenu
    • Teacher NumbersShow submenu
    • Teacher TurnoverShow submenu
    • Tertiary Financial PerformanceShow submenu
    • Tertiary ParticipationShow submenu
    • Tertiary Population DataShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResearchShow submenu
    • Tertiary ResourcingShow submenu
    • Tertiary Retention & AchievementShow submenu
    • Tertiary Summary TablesShow submenu
    • Vocational Education & TrainingShow submenu
  • Topics Show submenu
    • BES Programme: Hei Kete RaukuraShow submenu
      • What's NewShow submenu
      • Rongohia te Hau: IntroShow submenu
        • 1. Using learner, whānau, & teacher feedbackShow submenu
        • 2. Different perspectives inform actionShow submenu
        • 3. Co-constructing a continuum of effective teaching practiceShow submenu
        • 4. Collecting evidence of pedagogyShow submenu
        • 5. The learning is in the conversationShow submenu
        • 6. Impacting Māori successShow submenu
        • 7. Racism: Taking those blinkers offShow submenu
      • Ta’ovala Learning from Pacific expertise in educationShow submenu
        • Teacher PreparationShow submenu
        • The Lesson LaunchShow submenu
        • Low Floor, High CeilingShow submenu
        • Deeper LearningShow submenu
        • Sharing BackShow submenu
        • The ConnectShow submenu
        • Deeper ThinkingShow submenu
        • Equity, ExcellenceShow submenu
        • School Leadership MattersShow submenu
      • Ambitious mathematics for young Pacific learners: IntroShow submenu
        • The LaunchShow submenu
        • Group WorkShow submenu
        • Sharing BackShow submenu
        • The ConnectShow submenu
      • School leadership for improvement in primary mathematics education:Show submenu
        • 1. Pedagogical Leadership – Preparation Year 0Show submenu
        • 2. Teachers Responding to the ChallengeShow submenu
        • 3. Building Social Competencies for Accelerated ImprovementShow submenu
        • 4. The Mathematics Communication & Participation Framework: Integrated ProgressionsShow submenu
        • 5. In-class mentoring for accelerated pedagogical improvementShow submenu
        • 6. Deep Change: Applied post-graduate studyShow submenu
        • 7. Collaborative lesson study for sustainabilityShow submenu
        • 8. Towards Kāhui Ako: Building learning communityShow submenu
        • 9. Family & community: Partners in changeShow submenu
        • 10. Russell School: The DifferenceShow submenu
      • Reading Together®Show submenu
        • Fairhaven SchoolShow submenu
        • St Joseph's School OtahuhuShow submenu
        • Manurewa Central SchoolShow submenu
      • Using evidence for a step upShow submenu
      • Developing Mathematical Inquiry CommunitiesShow submenu
        • Developing Mathematical Inquiry CommunitiesShow submenu
        • A parent’s perspectiveShow submenu
        • Strategic change leadership meetingShow submenu
        • Mixed ability groupingShow submenu
        • Problem & launchShow submenu
        • Learning to listenShow submenu
        • Teacher developmentShow submenu
        • ImpactsShow submenu
        • Group normsShow submenu
        • Learning for lifeShow submenu
        • Learning togetherShow submenu
        • PerspectivesShow submenu
        • It’s a journeyShow submenu
        • Culturally responsive pedagogyShow submenu
        • Fundamental shiftsShow submenu
      • ResourcesShow submenu
        • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
        • BESs & BES CasesShow submenu
          • Full List of BES CasesShow submenu
          • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
        • Summaries of BESsShow submenu
          • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
          • Full Set of BESsShow submenu
        • BES What Works SpotlightsShow submenu
          • Spotlight on Counter-Bullying PedagogiesShow submenu
          • Spotlight on Mathematics/PāngarauShow submenu
          • Spotlight on LeadershipShow submenu
          • The Use of Evidence in PolicyShow submenu
        • Te Kotahitanga eBook CollectionShow submenu
      • Evidence ExplainedShow submenu
        • Disciplined innovation for equity & excellence in education: Learning from Māori & Pasifika change expertiseShow submenu
          • What's NewShow submenu
        • BES ExemplarsShow submenu
      • About BESShow submenu
    • Dashboards & InfographicsShow submenu
      • DashboardsShow submenu
        • School Leavers DashboardShow submenu
        • Teacher WorkforceShow submenu
        • School Rolls DashboardShow submenu
        • Te Mataaho-a-Iwi | Education DashboardShow submenu
        • Disabled people & tertiary educationShow submenu
        • Adult Skills Regional ProfilesShow submenu
        • Tertiary Population DataShow submenu
        • Post-school labour-market outcomes of school based NCEAShow submenu
        • Post-compulsory education & trainingShow submenu
      • InfographicsShow submenu
        • School Leavers InfographicsShow submenu
        • Iwi InfographicsShow submenu
        • Employer SurveyShow submenu
        • Not Just about NEETsShow submenu
    • e-LearningShow submenu
    • International EducationShow submenu
    • Pacific EducationShow submenu
    • Māori Education & Te Reo MāoriShow submenu
    • Te Mātauranga Māori me Te Reo MāoriShow submenu
    • School Annual ReportsShow submenu
      • 2019 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2018 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2017 NZ Schools Financial ReportsShow submenu
      • 2016 NZ Schools Financial Annual ReportsShow submenu
    • Student LoansShow submenu
      • Education Govt: InformationShow submenu
      • Stats NZ: Student LoansShow submenu
      • StudyLink: Student LoansShow submenu
      • Inland Revenue: Student LoansShow submenu
    • Tertiary EducationShow submenu
    • WorkforceShow submenu
    • Communities of Learning | Kāhui AkoShow submenu
  • Data Services Show submenu
    • Code Sets & ClassificationsShow submenu
    • Collection FormsShow submenu
    • GuidelinesShow submenu
    • School Enrolment ZonesShow submenu
    • School SMS Roll Returns 2021Show submenu
    • SMS VendorsShow submenu
    • Glossary FilterShow submenu
    • International Data CollectionsShow submenu
      • ALLShow submenu
      • ICCSShow submenu
      • OECD's Education at a Glance & INESShow submenu
        • EAG PublicationsShow submenu
        • Education Indicators in FocusShow submenu
        • Online Education DatabaseShow submenu
        • OECD: Education GPSShow submenu
      • PIRLSShow submenu
      • PISAShow submenu
      • PIAACShow submenu
        • PIAAC Publications SummaryShow submenu
      • TALISShow submenu
      • TIMSSShow submenu
    • National Data CollectionsShow submenu
      • 18-Year-Olds with NCEA Level 2Show submenu
      • Annual ECE Child & Staff ReturnShow submenu
      • AttendanceShow submenu
      • Boards of TrusteesShow submenu
      • ECE ParticipationShow submenu
      • School FundingShow submenu
      • School LeaversShow submenu
      • School Roll ReturnShow submenu
      • School RollsShow submenu
      • Schooling WorkforceShow submenu
        • MethodologiesShow submenu
      • Suspension DataShow submenu

Site information

  • Site map
  • Contact us
  • Feedback
  • About this site
  • Glossary
  • Accessibility
  • Copyright, Legal & Privacy
  • Links
  • © Education Counts 2021
  • Ministry of Education logo.
  • New Zealand Government logo.
Scroll to top of page