e-Learning and implications for New Zealand schools: A literature review

Publication Details

This e-Learning literature review examined texts across a range of countries, but within a relatively short time frame of the preceding five years. A range of criteria were used to select or eliminate studies for closer review (see Methodology and Methods section). Some key terms are defined for the purpose of this review: outcomes, e-Learning, tools, affordances, Web 2.0.

Author(s): Noeline Wright, Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, School of Education, The University of Waikato. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Date Published: July 2010

Please consider the environment before printing the contents of this report.

This report is available as a download (please refer to the 'Downloads' inset box).  For links to related publications/ information that may be of interest please refer to the 'Where to Find Out More' inset box.

Section 8: References

  • Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Wade, A, Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., & Zhang, D. (2008). A review of e-learning in Canada: Rejoinder to commentaries. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, 32(3). 
  • Ako Aotearoa. (2008). Designing for diversity
  • Alexander, B. (2008). Web 2.0 and emergent multiliteracies. Theory into practice, 47(2), 150. doi:10.1080/00405840801992371
  • Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43(4/5), 240 - 248. doi:10.1108/00400910110399247
  • de Almeida Soares, D. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 517-533. doi:10.1177/1362168808097165
  • Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  • Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020
  • Assogba, Y., & Donath, J. (2009). Mycrocosm: Visual Microblogging. In proceedings of the 42nd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS, January 5-8, 2009.
  • Ballantyne, L. M. (2004). In what ways could ICT teaching and learning take place at Orewa college? Osmosis, integration and/or specialist subjects? (Master of Education thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
  • Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2008). A study of teachers' integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 289. doi:10.1080/17439880802497008
  • Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Press.
  • Blignaut, S., & Nagel, L. (2009). Cousins Virtual Jane and Virtual Joe, extraordinary virtual helpers. Computers & Education, 53(1), 104-111. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.003
  • Boling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., Barton, K., & Nierlich, T. (2008). Collaborative literacy: blogs and internet projects. Reading Teacher, 61(6), 504-506. 
  • Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2006). Creating digital age learners through school ICT projects: What can the Tech Angels project teach us? Education Counts. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. 
  • Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J., & Shen, R. (2009). Microblogging for language learning: using Twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. SlideShare. Shanghai Jiao Tong University. 
  • Burke, A., & Rowsell, J. (2008). Screen pedagogy: Challenging perceptions of digital reading practice. Changing English, 15(4), 445. doi:10.1080/13586840802493092
  • Burkett, E. (2008). 'A new way of looking?' Reflections upon one teacher's experience of supporting learners using handheld computers. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 481-493. doi:10.1080/09650790802445668
  • Burt, D. (2007). The lure of podcasting (summary document). e fellows: research for teachers by teachers. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  • Cadogan, M. D. (2009). Web 2.0 rollercoaster. A ride we should all take. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 21(1), 1–3.
  • Campbell, N. (2001). e-teaching, e-learning and e-education. A paper to inform the development of the ICT Strategy in New Zealand for the Ministry of Education 
  • Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., & et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60.
  • CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT & Educational Performance. (2007). Cheju Island, South Korea: Orgnaisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Chandra, V. (2004). The impact of a blended web-based learning environment on the perceptions, attitudes, and performance of boys and girls in junior science and senior physics. (Doctoral thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Australia).
  • Chen, W., Tan, N. Y. L., Looi, C., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. S. K. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology-enhanced environmental learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 231-252.
  • Chettle, J. (2009, September 27). Not just passing fad, blogs have become influential. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 100-103.
  • Chism, N. V. N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning Spaces (pp. 2.0-2.12). Educause.
  • Claro, M. (2007). OECD Background Paper for OECD-KERIS Expert Meeting: Information and Communication Technologies and Educational Performance. OECD. 
  • Clyde, L. A. (2005). Educational blogging. Teacher Librarian, 32(3), 43-45. 
  • Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). Discussion Understanding and using technological affordances: a response to Boyle and Cook. ALT-J, 12(3), 301-308. doi:10.1080/0968776042000259609
  • Convery, A. (2009). The pedagogy of the impressed: how teachers become victims of technological vision. Teachers and Teaching, 15(1), 25. doi:10.1080/13540600802661303
  • Corbett, S., Mace, K., & Regehr, G. (n.d.). Twitter in the online classroom: Case Study Report (No. ED 690). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
  • Cosh, K. J., Burns, R., & Daniel, T. (2008). Content clouds classifying content in Web 2.0. Library Review, 57(9), 722–729.
  • Cowie, B., Jones, A., Harlow, A., McGee, C., Cooper, B., Forret, M., Miller, T., et al. (2008). TELA: Laptops for teachers evaluation, Final report, years 9 - 13. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. 
  • Cristina, C. (n.d.). Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE Summer School 2008.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, Michal. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy: The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96. doi:10.1177/1469787408100197
  • Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29(2), 127. doi:10.1080/01587910802154939
  • Douglas, R., & Kerr, N. (2010, February 7). Mobile learning champions [Video file]. 
  • Earl, K., & Forbes, D. (2008). Information communication technology: Destinations, highways, signposts and speedbumps. In C. McGee & D. Fraser (Eds.), The Professional Practice of Teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 189-203). Melbourne: Cengage.
  • Elearning Pedagogy. (n.d.). SAE Online.
  • Falloon, G. (2004). An analysis of the impact of an e-classroom environment on the social, cognitive and affective elements of student work practices (Doctoral thesis). Curtin University of Technology, Australia.
  • FLAG Secretariat, O. O. T. A. T. E. (2003, March 2). Australian Flexible Learning Framework for Vocational Education and training.
  • Franken, M., May, S., & McComish, J. (2005). Pasifika languages research and guidelines project: Literature review (p. 98). Hamilton, New Zealand: Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, The University of Waikato.
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Gordonsville, VA, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the Knowledge Wave? The knowledge society and the future of education (1st ed.). Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
  • Grant, L. (2009). 'I DON'T CARE - DO - UR - OWN - PAGE!' A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK - secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 105. doi:10.1080/17439880902923564
  • Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119. doi:10.1080/17439880902923580
  • Grenfell, M. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu: Education and training. Continuum library of educational thought (Vol. 2). London & New York: Continuum.
  • Ham, V. (2008). National trends in the ICT PD School Cluster Programme 2004-2006 (Final). Christchurch, New Zealand: CORE Education.
  • Ham, V. (2009). Outcomes for teachers and students in the ICT PD School Clusters Programme 2005-2007 - A national overview. Education Counts. 
  • Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2009). Motivating adolescents: high school teachers' perceptions and classroom practices. Teacher Development: An international journal of teachers' professional development, 13(1), 1. doi:10.1080/13664530902858469
  • Hartnell-Young, E., & Vetere, F. (2008). A means of personalising learning: incorporating old and new literacies in the curriculum with mobile phones. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 283-292. doi:10.1080/09585170802509872
  • Hayes, D. N. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003
  • Heafner, T. L., & Friedman, A. M. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 288-302. doi:10.1080/07380560802371003
  • Jackson, J. (2009). Game-based teaching: what educators can learn from videogames. Teaching Education, 20(3), 291. doi:10.1080/10476210902912533
  • James, M. (2006). Learning how to learn in classrooms, schools and networks (document No. 17). Research Briefing (pp. 1-4). London: Teaching and Learning Research programme: ESRC. 
  • Johna, P., & Sutherland, R. (2005). Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. Education Review, 57(4), 405-413.
  • Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-186. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970
  • Kennewell, S. (2008). Interactive teaching and ICT ( Research Brief). Teaching and Learning Research Programme (pp. 1-2). London: Teaching and Learning Research programme: ESRC. 
  • Kent, P. (2004). E-teaching and interactive whiteboards : the Richardson experience. Practising Administrator, 26(1), 14-16.
  • Kent, P., & Holdway, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboards, productive pedagogies and literacy teaching. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 17(1), 21-25.
  • Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004
  • Krumsvik, R. (2009). Situated learning in the network society and the digitised school. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 167-185. doi:10.1080/02619760802457224
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Law, N. (2008). Summary and Reflections. In W. J. Pelgrum, T. Plomp, & N. Law (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study, CERC Studies in Comparative Education (Vol. 23, p. 296). Hong Kong: CERC-Springer.
  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT Use
  • Learn 4 Life. (2009, September 17) What happens when you give a class of 8 year old children an iPod touch each? 
  • Lee, M. (2003). Reflecting on the last decade : the profound technological change: minimal change in schooling. Practising Administrator, 25(4), 20-21.
  • Lee, M. (2004). Into the information age: is it time to revisit your ICT and education strategy? Practising Administrator, 26(2), 24-25. 
  • Lewin, C., Mavers, D., & Somekh, B. (2003). Broadening access to the curriculum through using technology to link home and school: a critical analysis of reforms intended to improve students' educational attainment. Curriculum Journal, 14(1), 23-53. doi:Article
  • Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z
  • Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 49-63. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00015-0
  • Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87. doi:10.1080/17439880902921949
  • Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Blogs' affordances for identity work: Insights gained from an urban teacher's blog. The New Educator, 4(3), 175-198. doi:10.1080/15476880802234797
  • Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2009). Information technology in education: The need for a critical examination of popular assumptions. Computers in the Schools, 26(1-3), 1. doi:10.1080/07380560802688232
  • McLeod, J., & Vasinda, S. (2008). Critical literacy and Web 2.0: Exercising and negotiating power. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 259-274. doi:10.1080/07380560802394815
  • McVee, M. B., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008). Teachers and teacher educators learning from new literacies and new technologies. Teaching Education, 19(3), 197. doi:10.1080/10476210802250216
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence -based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education  Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development  Policy and Program Studies Service. 
  • Mentis, M. (2008). Navigating the e-learning terrain: Aligning technology, pedagogy and content. ECEL: The European Conference on e-learning, 6(3), 217-226.
  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (Australia and New Zealand). (2005). Pedagogy strategy: Learning in an online world. Curriculum Corporation.
  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Digital Horizons: learning through ICT. Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
  • Ministry of Education. (2006). Enabling the 21st Century Learner - e-Learning Action Plan for Schools 2006-2010. Learning Media Ltd. 
  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
  • Ministry of Education. (2008). Key evidence: And how we must use it improve system performance for Maori  Ka Hikitia Managing for Success: Maori Education Strategy 2008-2012. Learning Media Ltd.
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (n.d.) Desired Outcomes of Education
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for school? No way! Using the TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7), 14-18. 
  • Mitchell, B., Bailey, J., & Monroe, E. (2007). Integrating technology and a standards-based pedagogy in a geometry classroom. Computers in the Schools, 24(1), 75-91. doi:10.1300/J025v24n01_06
  • Mitchell, L. M. (2007). Using technology in Reggio Emilia-Inspired programs. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 32. doi:10.1080/00405840709336546
  • Moos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576-600.
  • Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2009). Engage secondary school students in extended and open learning supported by online technologies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 305-328.
  • Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147-153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.005
  • OECD. (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA tells us. Programme for Interantional Student Assessment (p. 138). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. 
  • Prensky, M. (2001b). Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-9.
  • Prensky, M. (2006). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Learners Together.
  • Reid, C. (2009). Technology-loving Luddites? Declining participation in high school computing studies in Australia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(3), 289-302. doi:10.1080/01425690902812562
  • Reisz, M. (2009). Short and tweet: modern philosophy and Twitter. Times Higher Education, (1911), 10.
  • Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  • Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The role of mobile devices in facilitating collaborative inquiry in situ. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 209-229.
  • Rumpagaporn, M. (2007). Students' critical thinking skills, attitudes to ICT and perceptions of ICT classroom learning environments under the ICT schools pilot project in Thailand (Doctoral thesis). The University of Adelaide, Australia. 
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). We think therefore we share: reading the thoughts of the digerati 2.0. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 191. doi:10.1080/17439880902923697
  • Smyth, J., & Hattam, Robert. (2004). 'Dropping out', drifting off, being excluded: Becoming somebody without school. Adolescent Cultures, School and Society (Vol. 22). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Somekh, B, Underwood, J., Convery, A., Dillon, G., Jarvis, J., & Lewin, C. (2007). Evaluation of the ICT Test Bed project (Final). Centre for ICT, Pedagogy and Learning  Education and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University: BECTA.
  • Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. New York NY: Routledge.
  • Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Physical activities and playful learning using mobile games. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 275-295.
  • Sprague, D., & Pixley, C. (2008). Podcasts in education: Let their voices be heard. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 226-324. doi:10.1080/07380560802368132
  • Squire, K. (2008). Videogames literacy: A literacy of expertise. In J. Coiro, D. J. Leu, C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Handbook of Research in New Literacies. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Stevenson, L. (2008). Personalised learning in a Web 2.0 environment. (Master of Education thesis). Waikato.
  • Stokes, D. (2008). Blogging for beginners. Learning Disability Practice, 11(3), 16-18.
  • Sutherland, R. (2004). Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 5-16. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.017
  • Teachers TV. (2006, June 30). Primary ICT - Natural connections [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.teachers.tv/video/4977
  • Tearle, P. (2004). The implementation of ICT in UK secondary schools (Final Report). UK: University of Exeter.
  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington: Ministry of Education. 
  • Twiss, T. (2008). Ubiqutious information. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2008). Managers', teachers' and learners' perceptions of personalised learning: evidence from Impact 2007. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 233. doi:10.1080/14759390802383850
  • University of South Dakota. (n.d.) Glossary of Library and Internet Terms.
  • Van Dusen, C. (2009, June 25). 21st century teacher education. eSchool News.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, Ed.). Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-Learning outcomes. Information & Management, 45(8), 513-521. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.08.003
  • Wright, N., May, S., Whitehead, D., Smyth, J., & Smyth, S. (2005). Secondary Schools' Literacy Initiative Research Evaluation: Sustaining literacy initiatives in secondary schools. Wilf Malcolm Institute of Education, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Contact Us

Education Data Requests
If you have any questions about education data then please contact us at:
Email:      Requests EDK
Phone:    +64 4 463 8065