Monitoring and evaluating curriculum implementation:

Final evaluation report on the implementation of the New Zealand Curriculum 2008-2009

Publication Details

This report presents findings from a national evaluation of the implementation of The New Zealand Curriculum. The project sought to establish a national picture of implementation progress in English-medium schools in the first two years following the curriculum's launch in November 2007.

Author(s): Dr Claire Sinnema, The University of Auckland. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Date Published: March 2011

Please consider the environment before printing the contents of this report.

This report is available as a download (please refer to the 'Downloads' inset box).  To view the individual chapters please refer to the 'Sections' inset box.

References

  • Aitken, G., & Sinnema, C. (2008). Effective pedagogy in Social Studies / Tikanga ā Iwi:   Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Bjork, C. (2009). Local implementation of Japan's integrated studies reform: A preliminary analysis of efforts to decentralise the curriculum. Comparative Education, 45(1), 23-44.
  • Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene, V. J. Caracelli & (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms, new directions for evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3-12.
  • Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Cowie, B., & Hipkins, R. (2009). Curriculum implementation exploratory studies: Final report [Electronic Version]. 
  • Evers, K. E., Prochaska, J. O., Van Marter, D. F., Johnson, J. L., & Prochaska, J. M. (2007). Transtheoretical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools. Educational Research, 49(4), 397-414.
  • Fullan, M. (Ed.). (2008). Curriculum implementation and sustainability. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397.
  • Goodlad, J. I., & Klein, M. F. (1974). Looking behind the classroom door; a useful guide to observing schools in action: Worthington, Ohio, C. A. Jones Pub. Co., 1974.
  • Greene, J. C., Benjamin, L., & Goodyear, L. (2001). The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 25-44.
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  • Hall, G. E., & Loucks, F. F. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(1), 52-56.
  • Hall, G. E., & Loucks, F. F. (1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 263-276.
  • Hall, G. E., & Loucks, F. F. (1981, April). The concept of Innovation configurations:  An approach to addressing program adaptation. Research on concerns-based adoption. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, CA.
  • James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 963-976.
  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegubuzie, A. J. (2007). A typology of mixed methods research. Quality and Quantity, 43(2), 265-275.
  • Levin, B. (Ed.). (2008). Curriculum policy and the politics of what should be learned in schools. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Mackenzie, G. N., & Lawler, M. R. (1948). Chapter V: Curriculum: Change and improvement. Review of Educational Research, 18(3), 273-281.
  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum  Wellington: Learning Media.
  • Niesche, R., & Jorgensen, R. (2010). Curriculum reform in remote areas: The need for productive leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 102-117.
  • O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33-84.
  • Patton, M. C. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
  • Prochaska, J. M. (2000). A transtheoretical model for assessing organizational change: A study of family service agencies' movement to time-limited therapy. Families in Society, 81(1), 76-84.
  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5, 390-395.
  • Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change:  Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102-1114.
  • Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2008). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883-907.
  • Rudduck, J., & Fielding, M. (2006). Student voice and the perils of popularity. Educational Review, 58(2), 219-231.
  • Spillane, J. (2004). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Spillane, J., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431.
  • The Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2007, June). Program evaluation standards (October 2007, Draft 3).
     van den Akker, J., & Verloop, N. (1994). Evaluation approaches and results in curriculum research and development in The Netherlands. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 421-436.

Contact Us

Education Data Requests
If you have any questions about education data then please contact us at:
Email:      Requests EDK
Phone:    +64 4 463 8065