Science - Trends in Year 5 science achievement 1994 to 2006
This report describes the science achievement of Year 5 students in TIMSS 2006/07. Trends in New Zealand’s achievement over the 12 years from 1994 to 2006 are examined, along with comparisons with other countries. Analyses of achievement by sub-groupings (such as gender and ethnicity) and background information are also presented. It was originally published in December 2008 and revised in September 2009 due to the mislabelling of the content domains knowing and applying. The current version rectifies this error.
Author: Robyn Caygill [Ministry of Education]Date Published: December 2008
Revised Version: September 2009
Skip to:
- Overview of TIMSS
- Acknowledgements
- Key findings
- Introduction
- Trends in New Zealand science achievement 1994 to 2006
- New Zealand science achievement in 2006 and in an international context
- TIMSS and the New Zealand science curriculum
- Science achievement by gender
- Science achievement by ethnicity
- Science achievement by socio-economic status and home educational resources
- Student attitudes
- Discussion of interactions
- Conclusion
- References
- Definitions and technical notes
- Erratum
Science achievement by gender
There was no significant difference in mean science achievement between Year 5 boys (502) and girls (506) in 2006. However, the distribution of achievement was wider for boys (313) than for girls (281) as shown in Figure 8. As Figure 8 also shows, the wider distribution among boys has been consistent over the four cycles. Similarly, there was no significant difference between the mean science achievement of boys and that of girls in each of the preceding cycles, with the exception of 1994 when girls had higher mean performance than boys. It is interesting to observe the narrowing of the distribution of science achievement for boys between 1994 and 2006.
Figure 8: Trends in distributions of achievement for girls and boys from 1994 to 2006

Note: Standard errors are presented in parentheses.
Benchmarks for Year 5 boys and girls
There was little difference between the proportions of boys and girls reaching each of the international benchmarks except for the low benchmark, where the difference was statistically significant (see Table 12). Fewer boys (85%) reached the low benchmark compared with the girls (89%). Another way of looking at this is to examine the proportions of boys and girls who did not reach this low benchmark. Proportionally more boys (15%) than girls (11%) did not reach the low benchmark – in terms of the benchmark definitions, these students did not demonstrate some elementary knowledge of life science and physical science.1
Table 12: Proportion of Year 5 students reaching each international benchmark by gender in TIMSS 2006/07
| Gender |
Percentage of Year 5 students reaching each benchmark
|
|||
|
Advanced
|
High
|
Intermediate
|
Low
|
|
| Girls |
7 (0.7)
|
31 (1.4)
|
67 (1.6)
|
89 (0.9)
|
| Boys |
9 (0.9)
|
33 (1.6)
|
63 (1.5)
|
85 (1.3)
|
Note: Standard errors are presented in parentheses.
Proportionally more boys and girls were lower achievers in 2006 compared with 2002, that is, did not reach the low benchmark. In 2002, seven percent of girls and eight percent of boys did not reach this benchmark (see Caygill, Sturrock, & Chamberlain, 2007, p. 68). This pattern was also observed across the low, intermediate, and high benchmarks, with proportionally fewer girls and boys reaching each of these benchmarks in 2006 compared with 2002. However, there was no significant difference between the proportions of girls and boys reaching the advanced benchmark in 2006 compared with 2002. When comparing 1994 and 2006, there were no significant differences in the proportion of girls and boys at each of the benchmarks.
Achievement on the content and cognitive domains for girls and boys
While there were no overall differences in mean science achievement between girls and boys, there were some distinct differences in terms of the content and cognitive domains. On average, girls had higher scores in life science, while boys had higher scores in earth science (see Table 13). Boys and girls performed similarly in the physical science domain. Boys and girls also performed similarly on questions involving knowledge or applying that knowledge. However, girls on average performed better than boys on questions involving reasoning.
Table 13: Year 5 mean science scores on the content and cognitive domains by gender
| Content domain |
Mean domain score
|
Cognitive Domain |
Mean domain score
|
||
|
Girls
|
Boys
|
Girls
|
Boys
|
||
| Life science |
512 (3.0) ▲
|
501 (3.8)
|
Knowing |
513 (3.1)
|
508 (3.1)
|
| Physical science |
500 (3.2)
|
497 (3.2)
|
Applying |
498 (2.7)
|
501 (3.2)
|
| Earth science |
512 (2.9)
|
518 (3.0) ▲
|
Reasoning |
514 (3.1)▲
|
497 (4.0)
|
Note:
▲ mean domain score significantly higher than other gender.
Standard errors are presented in parentheses.
Source: Exhibit 3.3 from Martin, Mullis & Foy, 2008.


