Competent Learners on the Edge of Adulthood: A summary of key findings from the Competent Learners @ 16 project
Publication Details
Competent Children, Competent Learners is a longitudinal study which began in 1993 and follows the progress of a sample of around 500 New Zealand young people from early childhood education through schooling and beyond. Several reports from the age-16 phase of the project have been published. This report summaries the key findings at age 16.
Author(s): Cathy Wylie, Edith Hodgen, Rosemary Hipkins, & Karen Vaughan [New Zealand Council for Educational Research]
Date Published: May 2009
4. The continuing effects of early childhood education
Earlier studies in the Competent Children Competent Learners project found that children’s cognitive and attitudinal competencies benefited from quality early childhood education.
The age-16 study found that aspects of the students’ early childhood education (ECE) still had associations with their performance 11 years later. The associations were generally weaker than they had been at age 14.
THE IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY
We found that high-quality centres had a positive, long-lasting association with students’ literacy, numeracy and logical problem-solving competencies, and also with their social skills.
These associations applied irrespective of their mother’s qualification or their family income. In other words, high-quality ECE centres were still providing lasting benefits for the participants in our study 11 years later, regardless of their background.
In the past, we found five measures of quality in early childhood education which had enduring effects on students’ performance. These five measures of quality continued to have an effect at age 16. They are:
- staff responsiveness
- staff guiding children in activities
- staff asking children open-ended questions
- staff joining children in their play
- providing a print-saturated environment.
THE EFFECT OF OTHER ASPECTS OF ECE
In earlier studies we found associations between competency after age-5 and the students’ experience of early childhood education, in particular:
- the age at which they first started ECE
- the total length of their ECE experience
- the socioeconomic mix of the final ECE centre they attended.
However, by age 16, only the last of these three experience measures was still associated with competency levels. We found that young people who had attended centres with children from mainly middle-class families were less likely to have social difficulties than those who had attended centres with fewer middle-class families. This association existed regardless of the student’s own background.
IMPLICATIONS
Our findings are consistent with a growing body of international research showing that children benefit from ECE experience and, in particular, from quality interactions with staff. We have found that these benefits can extend well beyond childhood.
This body of research underlines the importance of providing children with high-quality staff-child interactions. It follows that helping ECE centres to provide these types of interactions should be a priority at both planning and policy levels. One key rule of thumb could be the question: ‘Is this use of time/resources likely to improve/sustain the quality of child-staff interaction?’
Other international research provides useful information about ways to support quality staff-child interactions. These include:
- providing training that helps staff understand how young children learn, and the ways in which they can support the learning process by building on children’s interests, and deepening their thinking and their use of language
- having staff-child ratios that allow staff to know children as individuals, and to work with children in ways that help them develop confidently
- having staff stability.
Parents with pre-schoolers can also use these findings to help assess the quality of the ECE service they are thinking of using. A brief guide to quality is included in the box.
Rating early childhood education quality
Staff responsiveness
Centres with a high rating on this have staff who respond quickly and directly to children, and adapt their responses to individual children. The staff provide support, focused attention, physical proximity and verbal encouragement when appropriate. They are alert to signs of stress in children’s behaviour and guide children to express their emotions. Centres with a low rating have staff who ignore children’s requests and are oblivious to their needs.
Staff guiding children in activities
In centres with a high rating on this dimension, staff move among the children to encourage involvement with materials and activities. They also interact with children by asking questions and offering suggestions. They offer active guidance and encouragement in activities that are appropriate for individual children. In centres with a low rating, staff leave children to choose all their own activities.
Staff asking open-ended questions
Centres with a high rating on this dimension have staff who often ask children open-ended questions, encouraging them to come up with a range of different answers. This encourages thinking and creativity. Centres with a low rating have staff who never ask open-ended questions.
Staff joining children in their play
At centres with a high rating for this dimension, staff frequently join in children’s activities, and offer material, information or encouragement to facilitate play and learning around a particular theme. Staff at centres with a low rating only monitor children’s play, rather than joining in.
Providing a print-saturated environment
High-rating centres on this dimension are very print-focused. They encourage children’s awareness of print, have a lot of printed material at children’s eye level or just above, and offer children a range of readily accessible books. A low-rating centre has few books, posters or other forms of writing available to children.
Downloads / Links
Sections
- 1. Overview
- 2. How the research was done
- 3. Patterns of performance
- 4. The continuing effects of early childhood education
- 5. Engagement in school and learning
- 6. Experiences of secondary school
- 7. Experiences and views of NCEA
- 8. Out-of-school influences
- 9. Look ahead-the transition from school
- Downloads
Contact Us
For more publication-related information, please email: information.officer@minedu.govt.nz
Search Publications
Copyright © Education Counts 2011 | Contact information.officer@minedu.govt.nz for enquiries.