e-Learning and implications for New Zealand schools: A literature review

Publication Details

This e-Learning literature review examined texts across a range of countries, but within a relatively short time frame of the preceding five years. A range of criteria were used to select or eliminate studies for closer review (see Methodology and Methods section). Some key terms are defined for the purpose of this review: outcomes, e-Learning, tools, affordances, Web 2.0.

Author(s): Noeline Wright, Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, School of Education, The University of Waikato. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education.

Date Published: July 2010

Please consider the environment before printing the contents of this report.

This report is available as a download (please refer to the 'Downloads' inset box).  For links to related publications/ information that may be of interest please refer to the 'Where to Find Out More' inset box.

Section 8: References

  • Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Wade, A, Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., & Zhang, D. (2008). A review of e-learning in Canada: Rejoinder to commentaries. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, 32(3). 
  • Ako Aotearoa. (2008). Designing for diversity
  • Alexander, B. (2008). Web 2.0 and emergent multiliteracies. Theory into practice, 47(2), 150. doi:10.1080/00405840801992371
  • Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43(4/5), 240 - 248. doi:10.1108/00400910110399247
  • de Almeida Soares, D. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 517-533. doi:10.1177/1362168808097165
  • Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  • Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020
  • Assogba, Y., & Donath, J. (2009). Mycrocosm: Visual Microblogging. In proceedings of the 42nd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, HICSS, January 5-8, 2009.
  • Ballantyne, L. M. (2004). In what ways could ICT teaching and learning take place at Orewa college? Osmosis, integration and/or specialist subjects? (Master of Education thesis). Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
  • Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2008). A study of teachers' integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 289. doi:10.1080/17439880802497008
  • Bishop, R., & Berryman, M. (2006). Culture speaks: Cultural relationships and classroom learning. Wellington, New Zealand: Huia Press.
  • Blignaut, S., & Nagel, L. (2009). Cousins Virtual Jane and Virtual Joe, extraordinary virtual helpers. Computers & Education, 53(1), 104-111. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.003
  • Boling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., Barton, K., & Nierlich, T. (2008). Collaborative literacy: blogs and internet projects. Reading Teacher, 61(6), 504-506. 
  • Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2006). Creating digital age learners through school ICT projects: What can the Tech Angels project teach us? Education Counts. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. 
  • Bonk, C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J., & Shen, R. (2009). Microblogging for language learning: using Twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. SlideShare. Shanghai Jiao Tong University. 
  • Burke, A., & Rowsell, J. (2008). Screen pedagogy: Challenging perceptions of digital reading practice. Changing English, 15(4), 445. doi:10.1080/13586840802493092
  • Burkett, E. (2008). 'A new way of looking?' Reflections upon one teacher's experience of supporting learners using handheld computers. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 481-493. doi:10.1080/09650790802445668
  • Burt, D. (2007). The lure of podcasting (summary document). e fellows: research for teachers by teachers. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  • Cadogan, M. D. (2009). Web 2.0 rollercoaster. A ride we should all take. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 21(1), 1–3.
  • Campbell, N. (2001). e-teaching, e-learning and e-education. A paper to inform the development of the ICT Strategy in New Zealand for the Ministry of Education 
  • Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., & et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60.
  • CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT & Educational Performance. (2007). Cheju Island, South Korea: Orgnaisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Chandra, V. (2004). The impact of a blended web-based learning environment on the perceptions, attitudes, and performance of boys and girls in junior science and senior physics. (Doctoral thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Australia).
  • Chen, W., Tan, N. Y. L., Looi, C., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. S. K. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology-enhanced environmental learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 231-252.
  • Chettle, J. (2009, September 27). Not just passing fad, blogs have become influential. Richmond Times-Dispatch, 100-103.
  • Chism, N. V. N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning Spaces (pp. 2.0-2.12). Educause.
  • Claro, M. (2007). OECD Background Paper for OECD-KERIS Expert Meeting: Information and Communication Technologies and Educational Performance. OECD. 
  • Clyde, L. A. (2005). Educational blogging. Teacher Librarian, 32(3), 43-45. 
  • Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). Discussion Understanding and using technological affordances: a response to Boyle and Cook. ALT-J, 12(3), 301-308. doi:10.1080/0968776042000259609
  • Convery, A. (2009). The pedagogy of the impressed: how teachers become victims of technological vision. Teachers and Teaching, 15(1), 25. doi:10.1080/13540600802661303
  • Corbett, S., Mace, K., & Regehr, G. (n.d.). Twitter in the online classroom: Case Study Report (No. ED 690). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
  • Cosh, K. J., Burns, R., & Daniel, T. (2008). Content clouds classifying content in Web 2.0. Library Review, 57(9), 722–729.
  • Cowie, B., Jones, A., Harlow, A., McGee, C., Cooper, B., Forret, M., Miller, T., et al. (2008). TELA: Laptops for teachers evaluation, Final report, years 9 - 13. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. 
  • Cristina, C. (n.d.). Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE Summer School 2008.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, Michal. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy: The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96. doi:10.1177/1469787408100197
  • Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems. Distance Education, 29(2), 127. doi:10.1080/01587910802154939
  • Douglas, R., & Kerr, N. (2010, February 7). Mobile learning champions [Video file]. 
  • Earl, K., & Forbes, D. (2008). Information communication technology: Destinations, highways, signposts and speedbumps. In C. McGee & D. Fraser (Eds.), The Professional Practice of Teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 189-203). Melbourne: Cengage.
  • Elearning Pedagogy. (n.d.). SAE Online.
  • Falloon, G. (2004). An analysis of the impact of an e-classroom environment on the social, cognitive and affective elements of student work practices (Doctoral thesis). Curtin University of Technology, Australia.
  • FLAG Secretariat, O. O. T. A. T. E. (2003, March 2). Australian Flexible Learning Framework for Vocational Education and training.
  • Franken, M., May, S., & McComish, J. (2005). Pasifika languages research and guidelines project: Literature review (p. 98). Hamilton, New Zealand: Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, The University of Waikato.
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Gordonsville, VA, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the Knowledge Wave? The knowledge society and the future of education (1st ed.). Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
  • Grant, L. (2009). 'I DON'T CARE - DO - UR - OWN - PAGE!' A case study of using wikis for collaborative work in a UK - secondary school. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 105. doi:10.1080/17439880902923564
  • Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119. doi:10.1080/17439880902923580
  • Grenfell, M. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu: Education and training. Continuum library of educational thought (Vol. 2). London & New York: Continuum.
  • Ham, V. (2008). National trends in the ICT PD School Cluster Programme 2004-2006 (Final). Christchurch, New Zealand: CORE Education.
  • Ham, V. (2009). Outcomes for teachers and students in the ICT PD School Clusters Programme 2005-2007 - A national overview. Education Counts. 
  • Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2009). Motivating adolescents: high school teachers' perceptions and classroom practices. Teacher Development: An international journal of teachers' professional development, 13(1), 1. doi:10.1080/13664530902858469
  • Hartnell-Young, E., & Vetere, F. (2008). A means of personalising learning: incorporating old and new literacies in the curriculum with mobile phones. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 283-292. doi:10.1080/09585170802509872
  • Hayes, D. N. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.003
  • Heafner, T. L., & Friedman, A. M. (2008). Wikis and constructivism in secondary social studies: Fostering a deeper understanding. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 288-302. doi:10.1080/07380560802371003
  • Jackson, J. (2009). Game-based teaching: what educators can learn from videogames. Teaching Education, 20(3), 291. doi:10.1080/10476210902912533
  • James, M. (2006). Learning how to learn in classrooms, schools and networks (document No. 17). Research Briefing (pp. 1-4). London: Teaching and Learning Research programme: ESRC. 
  • Johna, P., & Sutherland, R. (2005). Affordance, opportunity and the pedagogical implications of ICT. Education Review, 57(4), 405-413.
  • Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-186. doi:10.1080/01587910802154970
  • Kennewell, S. (2008). Interactive teaching and ICT ( Research Brief). Teaching and Learning Research Programme (pp. 1-2). London: Teaching and Learning Research programme: ESRC. 
  • Kent, P. (2004). E-teaching and interactive whiteboards : the Richardson experience. Practising Administrator, 26(1), 14-16.
  • Kent, P., & Holdway, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboards, productive pedagogies and literacy teaching. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 17(1), 21-25.
  • Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: Using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.004
  • Krumsvik, R. (2009). Situated learning in the network society and the digitised school. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(2), 167-185. doi:10.1080/02619760802457224
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Law, N. (2008). Summary and Reflections. In W. J. Pelgrum, T. Plomp, & N. Law (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study, CERC Studies in Comparative Education (Vol. 23, p. 296). Hong Kong: CERC-Springer.
  • Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT Use
  • Learn 4 Life. (2009, September 17) What happens when you give a class of 8 year old children an iPod touch each? 
  • Lee, M. (2003). Reflecting on the last decade : the profound technological change: minimal change in schooling. Practising Administrator, 25(4), 20-21.
  • Lee, M. (2004). Into the information age: is it time to revisit your ICT and education strategy? Practising Administrator, 26(2), 24-25. 
  • Lewin, C., Mavers, D., & Somekh, B. (2003). Broadening access to the curriculum through using technology to link home and school: a critical analysis of reforms intended to improve students' educational attainment. Curriculum Journal, 14(1), 23-53. doi:Article
  • Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9070-z
  • Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 41(1), 49-63. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00015-0
  • Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16-year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87. doi:10.1080/17439880902921949
  • Luehmann, A. L. (2008). Blogs' affordances for identity work: Insights gained from an urban teacher's blog. The New Educator, 4(3), 175-198. doi:10.1080/15476880802234797
  • Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2009). Information technology in education: The need for a critical examination of popular assumptions. Computers in the Schools, 26(1-3), 1. doi:10.1080/07380560802688232
  • McLeod, J., & Vasinda, S. (2008). Critical literacy and Web 2.0: Exercising and negotiating power. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 259-274. doi:10.1080/07380560802394815
  • McVee, M. B., Bailey, N. M., & Shanahan, L. E. (2008). Teachers and teacher educators learning from new literacies and new technologies. Teaching Education, 19(3), 197. doi:10.1080/10476210802250216
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence -based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education  Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development  Policy and Program Studies Service. 
  • Mentis, M. (2008). Navigating the e-learning terrain: Aligning technology, pedagogy and content. ECEL: The European Conference on e-learning, 6(3), 217-226.
  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (Australia and New Zealand). (2005). Pedagogy strategy: Learning in an online world. Curriculum Corporation.
  • Ministry of Education. (2002). Digital Horizons: learning through ICT. Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
  • Ministry of Education. (2006). Enabling the 21st Century Learner - e-Learning Action Plan for Schools 2006-2010. Learning Media Ltd. 
  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
  • Ministry of Education. (2008). Key evidence: And how we must use it improve system performance for Maori  Ka Hikitia Managing for Success: Maori Education Strategy 2008-2012. Learning Media Ltd.
  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (n.d.) Desired Outcomes of Education
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for school? No way! Using the TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7), 14-18. 
  • Mitchell, B., Bailey, J., & Monroe, E. (2007). Integrating technology and a standards-based pedagogy in a geometry classroom. Computers in the Schools, 24(1), 75-91. doi:10.1300/J025v24n01_06
  • Mitchell, L. M. (2007). Using technology in Reggio Emilia-Inspired programs. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 32. doi:10.1080/00405840709336546
  • Moos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576-600.
  • Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2009). Engage secondary school students in extended and open learning supported by online technologies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 305-328.
  • Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D. (2009). Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52(1), 147-153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.005
  • OECD. (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA tells us. Programme for Interantional Student Assessment (p. 138). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. 
  • Prensky, M. (2001b). Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-9.
  • Prensky, M. (2006). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Learners Together.
  • Reid, C. (2009). Technology-loving Luddites? Declining participation in high school computing studies in Australia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(3), 289-302. doi:10.1080/01425690902812562
  • Reisz, M. (2009). Short and tweet: modern philosophy and Twitter. Times Higher Education, (1911), 10.
  • Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
  • Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The role of mobile devices in facilitating collaborative inquiry in situ. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 209-229.
  • Rumpagaporn, M. (2007). Students' critical thinking skills, attitudes to ICT and perceptions of ICT classroom learning environments under the ICT schools pilot project in Thailand (Doctoral thesis). The University of Adelaide, Australia. 
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). We think therefore we share: reading the thoughts of the digerati 2.0. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 191. doi:10.1080/17439880902923697
  • Smyth, J., & Hattam, Robert. (2004). 'Dropping out', drifting off, being excluded: Becoming somebody without school. Adolescent Cultures, School and Society (Vol. 22). New York: Peter Lang.
  • Somekh, B, Underwood, J., Convery, A., Dillon, G., Jarvis, J., & Lewin, C. (2007). Evaluation of the ICT Test Bed project (Final). Centre for ICT, Pedagogy and Learning  Education and Social Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University: BECTA.
  • Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. New York NY: Routledge.
  • Spikol, D., & Milrad, M. (2008). Physical activities and playful learning using mobile games. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 275-295.
  • Sprague, D., & Pixley, C. (2008). Podcasts in education: Let their voices be heard. Computers in the Schools, 25(3), 226-324. doi:10.1080/07380560802368132
  • Squire, K. (2008). Videogames literacy: A literacy of expertise. In J. Coiro, D. J. Leu, C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel (Eds.), Handbook of Research in New Literacies. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Stevenson, L. (2008). Personalised learning in a Web 2.0 environment. (Master of Education thesis). Waikato.
  • Stokes, D. (2008). Blogging for beginners. Learning Disability Practice, 11(3), 16-18.
  • Sutherland, R. (2004). Designs for learning: ICT and knowledge in the classroom. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 5-16. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.017
  • Teachers TV. (2006, June 30). Primary ICT - Natural connections [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.teachers.tv/video/4977
  • Tearle, P. (2004). The implementation of ICT in UK secondary schools (Final Report). UK: University of Exeter.
  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington: Ministry of Education. 
  • Twiss, T. (2008). Ubiqutious information. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
  • Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2008). Managers', teachers' and learners' perceptions of personalised learning: evidence from Impact 2007. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 233. doi:10.1080/14759390802383850
  • University of South Dakota. (n.d.) Glossary of Library and Internet Terms.
  • Van Dusen, C. (2009, June 25). 21st century teacher education. eSchool News.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, Ed.). Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-Learning outcomes. Information & Management, 45(8), 513-521. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.08.003
  • Wright, N., May, S., Whitehead, D., Smyth, J., & Smyth, S. (2005). Secondary Schools' Literacy Initiative Research Evaluation: Sustaining literacy initiatives in secondary schools. Wilf Malcolm Institute of Education, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.